Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:27 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1465
Location: Blenheim, NZ
ricusa wrote:
Also wonderd why all the currant flying Mosquitos regardless of type all have the flat fighter windscreen?

That's because that's the type of windscreen appropriate for the F(ighter)B(omber) and T(rainer) models. The airworthy B.35 in Canada has the bomber windscreen, again appropriate for that model.

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 736
Location: Ontario
Some great photos over on one of the UK forums, sure looks sharp!
https://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic ... e23a436150


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 553
Thomas_Mac wrote:
Some great photos over on one of the UK forums, sure looks sharp!
https://forums.airshows.co.uk/viewtopic ... e23a436150


Those really are some great photographs, and a beautiful aircraft!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
Zac Yates wrote:
ricusa wrote:
Also wonderd why all the currant flying Mosquitos regardless of type all have the flat fighter windscreen?

That's because that's the type of windscreen appropriate for the F(ighter)B(omber) and T(rainer) models. The airworthy B.35 in Canada has the bomber windscreen, again appropriate for that model.


And the B.IV DZ452 that Avspecs have the remains of for sale is also a glazed nose, non'flat windscreen version, which will be great to see done as well, if anyone buys it, especially as this saw WW2 use from bases in Scotland with 618 Sqn in 1944/5.
However, Peter Monk's public announcement that Avspec will be doing a FB.VI for them to operate in the UK, makes me think that they intend converted DZ into a solid nose FB version, which would be a shame, as the only potentially airworthy B.IV.
I assume DZ452 is the one destined for Biggin Hill, as I'm not aware of any other project/remains with an identity that it could be??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
It's a bit more important than the only potentially airworthy B.IV. it is the only surviving B.IV.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2491
Location: New Zealand
Firebird wrote:
Zac Yates wrote:
ricusa wrote:
Also wonderd why all the currant flying Mosquitos regardless of type all have the flat fighter windscreen?

That's because that's the type of windscreen appropriate for the F(ighter)B(omber) and T(rainer) models. The airworthy B.35 in Canada has the bomber windscreen, again appropriate for that model.


And the B.IV DZ452 that Avspecs have the remains of for sale is also a glazed nose, non'flat windscreen version, which will be great to see done as well, if anyone buys it, especially as this saw WW2 use from bases in Scotland with 618 Sqn in 1944/5.
However, Peter Monk's public announcement that Avspec will be doing a FB.VI for them to operate in the UK, makes me think that they intend converted DZ into a solid nose FB version, which would be a shame, as the only potentially airworthy B.IV.
I assume DZ452 is the one destined for Biggin Hill, as I'm not aware of any other project/remains with an identity that it could be??


No, Peter will be supplying the identity of the Biggin Hill project AFAIK.

_________________
Classic Wings Magazine

https://www.classicwings.com/

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ClassicWingsMagazine/

Preserved Axis Aircraft

http://www.classicwings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:15 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1465
Location: Blenheim, NZ
Firebird wrote:
Zac Yates wrote:
That's because that's the type of windscreen appropriate for the F(ighter)B(omber) and T(rainer) models. The airworthy B.35 in Canada has the bomber windscreen, again appropriate for that model.

And the B.IV DZ452 that Avspecs have the remains of for sale is also a glazed nose, non'flat windscreen version, which will be great to see done as well, if anyone buys it, especially as this saw WW2 use from bases in Scotland with 618 Sqn in 1944/5.
However, Peter Monk's public announcement that Avspec will be doing a FB.VI for them to operate in the UK, makes me think that they intend converted DZ into a solid nose FB version, which would be a shame, as the only potentially airworthy B.IV.
I assume DZ452 is the one destined for Biggin Hill, as I'm not aware of any other project/remains with an identity that it could be??

I spoke to several folks from Avspecs at Warbirds Over Wanaka this last weekend and Peter Monk's machine IS NOT DZ542 - she is on the market with Platinum and the airframe is well advanced (DZ542's fuselage can be glimpsed briefly in this TV current affairs piece about NZ2308: https://youtu.be/wiDab5_obYc?si=fTDNrxwkmTm3sRYB). The Monk aircraft is an actual FB.VI. The person I spoke to couldn't commit to saying anything about the ID but my personal belief is that it will be TE881/NZ2345, the other identity recovered from John Smith's (TE910/NZ2336) property.

DaveM2 wrote:
No, Peter will be supplying the identity of the Biggin Hill project AFAIK.

We posted at the same time! Thank you for the clarification, Dave.

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 554
Location: Auckland, NZ
Reassembly has started at Chino. Nice work on the registration, DH98 MOSQUITO T43 Serial A52-1052 as N2308Z.

https://www.facebook.com/airclassicsmag ... SZHjVcCpcl


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 2:15 am
Posts: 748
Location: Misawa, Japan
I would love to see Steve Hinton's log books. Not only how many hours he has, but which different warbirds that he's had his hands on.

Mac

_________________
WWII Naval Aviation Research - Pacific
https://www.ww2nar-pac.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 1:36 pm
Posts: 750
Jim MacDonald wrote:
I would love to see Steve Hinton's log books. Not only how many hours he has, but which different warbirds that he's had his hands on.

Mac

Yea, I don't think there is anybody alive that has the breadth of experience in so many different warbirds that he has. I asked him those questions a while back (12 - 15 years ago?). At that time, I think he said he had 10,000 plus hrs in warbirds. He also told me that the only major warbirds that he hadn't flown up to that point were the Me-262 and Helldiver. Since then, I know that he got an Me-262 type rating in the 2 seater in preparation for testing Paul Allen's bird. So that would leave the Helldiver as the only major warbird he hadn't flown. He might have flown it since then, however. With 4 of them about to be airworthy in the near future, it wouldn't surprise me if he marked that one off the list as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 281 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group