Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 09, 2026 6:25 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
All these posts about the B17 and not one word about the fine food in the Bomber Restaurant. (I have had two terrific breakfasts there.)
What is this forum coming to???
:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
ww2John,
Is the coffee any account?

Doug

_________________
"I love the smell of 100LL in the morning."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Stick 'em inside...
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:03 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Mesa, Arizona USA
davem wrote:
It is now time for the next generation to take on these projects and see all histroric aircraft that are sitting outside find a home inside - it does not matter if they will fly again or not, they do not deserve to rot out in the weather.


Roger that!

Now THAT'S the point I can agree upon 100 percent. And therein, lies the "rub" if you will, for those of us who are all for preservation of vintage aircraft.

No matter where you live, real estate cost in today's market is downright obscene. At my area municipal airport, there's a 5 to 8 YEAR waiting list for covered hangar space, and outdoor storage is no longer offered by my municipality. Here's the irony - if someone was to GIVE me a B-17 (which to date no one has offered...) it's not an issue of whether or not I could keep it at the local airport. I couldn't because space for said - especially indoor storage space - is just not available.

And, if I had all kinds of income to make this happen, would the general public be more accepting of say, Mr. Lacey's B-17, or a Gulfstream corporate jet in that city hangar? My municipal watchdogs would certainly want the later.

I concur that it would be a wonderful blessing for this a/c to be indoors. I have my fingers crossed that some rich millionaire or benefactor will come to this mindset, too, and make an offer to the family. What a neat transition this would be for the next 60 years of this airplane's life - to be covered and housed and not subject to bird poop, rainstorms, corrosion and freak acts of weather (or vandals). And to be pampered over by a staff or volunteers who are passionate about this type of airframe? Man, that would be the best thing possible.

But unless someone ponies up to make this happen - either by coughing up the bucks or acting as a neutral party between owner and buyer, it'll continue to sit out of doors until it rots off the pylons.

And as the sun sets all across the globe right now, there's many rare and historic airplanes out there in the elements just corroding away. Sad, but true. I'm all for fibreglas replacements and the real examples in museums, yet I hear nothing from the museum side saying, "Heck yeah - we'll make it happen!" Have you?

Can't help but wonder about the condition of two neat "outdoor stored" warriors right this very moment - like the B-17 and B-24 in the Barksdale, AFB, LA collection? They are two "survivors" of the post WWII scrappings that have fared a little better with attention from staff and volunteers over the past decades... but it goes back to our initial bone of contention. They may be restored to static condition.. but where exactly are they sitting?

They're both outdoors right now getting hammered in WX brought on by a hurricane... just as you are reading this very post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:23 am
Posts: 484
Location: maple ridge b.c. canada
i hear what you are saying about municipal interference, but i was playing the devils advocate on that one. how easy is it to walk past that car or truck that has been sitting in your yard for years and thinking ï gotta get on that one day". every day you walk past it and it gets a little worse and a little worse,but because you walk past it every day, you dont even notice anymore how bad its getting. then one day you decide to wash it and take a look at it with some pals and a few beers,and you realize that what was once a matter of putting a new engine into it has turned into that and some new floor pans, and now the trunk is rusted out, the brakes need doing and everything electrical is toast. awww, hell you say. ï dont have time to get involved with that right now. but you still brag about the fact that you have a 55 chevy to anyone that will listen. see where i'm going with this?? if these folks want to see their airplane saved, they are going to have to face the fact that they need some outside assistance. people who run a coffee shop and a gas station cant afford to restore a B-17. no offence meant. the best thing that could happen is that they seek out a suitable partnership with someone that has the means to make this a reality. i'm sure that the folks that own this bomber love the plane and have all of the best intentions in the world, but the time has definately come to loosen the ties that bind a bit and accept or seek out some professional assistance in getting this aircraft at least protected. the days of a plane on a stick are over. its an eyesore now. sorry to be so blunt but thats how i see it. when the folks that are restoring the urbana b-17 are cobbling together 3 or more airframes to come up with a flyer, while there are numerous semi abandoned aircraft in the usa,(that ones gonna get me in trouble) just begging to be restored,youve gotta wonder where peoples heads are at that own these ignored treasures.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:03 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Mesa, Arizona USA
I see your point exactly, Groundpounder. Understood and well expressed.

It geography that keeps me out of Oregon and down here in the desert right now, or I am sure I'd figure some way to get involved on that project and try to see a little positive forward motion.

I think we're all on the same page - we do this stuff out of respect and commitment to the airframes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:56 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
I think we're all on the same page - we do this stuff out of respect and commitment to the airframes.

and there lies the problem with the Milwaukee B-17. They're in it for the bottom line. The a/c is the draw for their business. This is why they were denied 501c3 status by the IRS and had to return all the donated $$ they collected expecting to have their non-profit status approved. If it was about the a/c it would have come down years ago!

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group