Robbie Roberts wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I think you should be asking why the AF took a FLYABLE P-38 and mounted it on a pole in NJ ?
Because the base McGuire AFB is named for a P-38 ace- second highest scoring ace form the Pacific. It is the only 2nd WW aircraft on the base as far as I can tell. They have one of the later C-54s- (I think it is a C-128 or something, rumored to be the one Elvis came home on) an F-4, an F-100 and one of the few surviving C-141s.
Not all birds will fly again- so leave the USAF P-38(known as "Pudgy") at McGuire alone- at least it is still around, and not blown up! It is actually a pretty nice gateway, and the aircraft is maintained in polished condition- at least it isn't overcoated with fifteen layers of paint and corrosion, as some aircraft I see on display are.
Robbie
I think Matt has put forth a valid question here. To have an aircraft this rare on a pole in the NJ climate is just stupid (same with the Alaska P-38G), and has nothing to do with preservation. So until the P-38 is indoors we will not leave it alone. Put a fibreglass replica on a pole or better yet, a statue of the guy. After all it is McGuire AFB and not P-38 AFB. As for the debate of flying vs static I feel that Matt is just a little upset about the fate of a P-38 that used to be flyable, and which is now not only static, but also not treated the way it ought to be.
T J