Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm Posts: 3442 Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
|
|
I think the main reason the boots were removed was battle damage. Torn up boots were causing big problems during early operations with the B-17s and '24s in the ETO, and they weren't of much use at high altitude, so off they came.
I'd have to find my manual, but I think later production Superforts were built without the boots but retained the plumbing to the wings and tail in case the boots were installed later. I know the B-29Bs were delivered from Marietta without boots.
A lot of B-29s had boots in the postwar years, including the recon and tanker versions to name only a couple of applications.
Scott
|
|