Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 11:16 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Boeing B-29 wing deicers
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 722
Location: Tucson, AZ
Did B-29s have wing deicers? If so what kind? Most of the survivors in museums do not appear to have them. Thanks for any info.
bill word


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
The B-29, as did most WWII bombers, had rubber inflatable de-ice boots that were removed before going into combat. I'm guessing they were not needed since the combat crews didn't, or rarely flew in icing conditions. With the weight removed they could carry more fuel or more bombs. Some of the photos of camo B-17s look as though they have bare metal wing and stabilizer leading edges. This is where the rubber boots were removed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:25 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2997
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Look closely at pictures of Kee Bird. You can see remnants of the boots flapping in the wind, especially on the vertical stab.

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
I think the main reason the boots were removed was battle damage. Torn up boots were causing big problems during early operations with the B-17s and '24s in the ETO, and they weren't of much use at high altitude, so off they came.

I'd have to find my manual, but I think later production Superforts were built without the boots but retained the plumbing to the wings and tail in case the boots were installed later. I know the B-29Bs were delivered from Marietta without boots.

A lot of B-29s had boots in the postwar years, including the recon and tanker versions to name only a couple of applications.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 147 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group