k5083 wrote:
Inspector, it's better if you colorize the photo first.
Seriously, now that 262crew has moderated his position to where it is reasonable, I can agree with it. In the post I quoted, he didn't seem to get the point of authenticity at all.
He is also wrong about there being "two very distinct groups, the cell structure counters and the ones that love to see both types of restorations." Actually there is a third group, one that loves only hot flyable airplanes, cares not a whit for authenticity, and thinks any static restoration is dead and worthless. And he omits to mention that the first and third groups are really just theoretical extremes where hardly anybody really resides. We are ALL right there in the middle camp with 262crew, he's just trying to assign anybody who's a bit more concerned with accuracy than he is into the extreme position.August
Excuse me sir but you are wrong about me being wrong

I do not hold a position of "assigning" anything or anyone, clearly my position is one of concern for all generations to witness these wonderful man made creations be it flying or not, 100% authentic or not

My position is one of openess and fairness and respect for ones opinions even if I do not agree. So can you define your position clearly
