Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 4:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4528
Location: Dallas, TX
For the record - as a Constitutionally minded individual, who tends to think that persons should be self-governing, and that if something is not immoral according to Biblical standards it should be allowed, I think that passengers who are properly informed of the risks, should be allowed to request or participate in formation flights. I'm also a bit uncomfortable with the FAA having the right to regulate stupidity - because they really can't prevent that - as evidenced by the amount of crashes that can still be attributed to pilot error.
On the other hand, as a pilot, who willingly has submitted to the current system, and understanding the current legal situation, I think that one should strictly avoid formation flight where any money has changed hands by anyone other than the pilot. This is a bit more personal to me as the squadron I'm in suffered quite a blow a number of years back (before I joined) in a formation accident (collision) that claimed the life of 4 individuals. It's taken them a long time to recover from the various effects.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:54 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
I think that one should strictly avoid formation flight where any money has changed hands by anyone other than the pilot.

I think it should only be avoid if it hasn't been throughly briefed before hand or when when the individuals aren't familar with or comfortable with the others in their proposed formation.
I remember at the Fresno B-25 reunion on the form flights the last a/c was Gen Lyon's and the pilot didn't feel comfortable with formation so he flew a solo tail end charlie. That decision was very respected by the other crews!

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Yep
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois
Ztex wrote:
Is the B-17 CO-OP still a viable organization? ( I think I remember hearing that they met last year in Oshkosh...they might be the one's to approach.


As viable as it ever was. And yes, the meeting was in Oshkosh
last October.

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ???
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:46 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4528
Location: Dallas, TX
Jack Cook wrote:
Quote:
I think that one should strictly avoid formation flight where any money has changed hands by anyone other than the pilot.

I think it should only be avoid if it hasn't been throughly briefed before hand or when when the individuals aren't familar with or comfortable with the others in their proposed formation.
I remember at the Fresno B-25 reunion on the form flights the last a/c was Gen Lyon's and the pilot didn't feel comfortable with formation so he flew a solo tail end charlie. That decision was very respected by the other crews!


I guess it really depends on how one defines a passenger and if the aircraft is being operated for compensation or hire. Believe me, I don't see anything morally wrong with what you are saying - only that the FAA's interpretation might differ. I wonder if someone like the Collins group has more information, and if anyone has ever been able to get a waiver. On the other hand, I'm sure that there are flights that just aren't discussed... but there's no way a B-17 group could sneak a formation flight for paying customers... it's just be too visible, and obvious.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 143 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group