Bill Greenwood wrote:
As for the Parker Plane being a threat to the unlimiteds, I'd have some doubts about that? What is the fatest officail lap Parker ever turned at Reno. I would be surprised if it was much over 400, whereas Bear, Strega, and Dago have been up around 490. ( I know they have computer updated to claim the course is now longer than it was so the speeds are higher, but I am using the genuine figures for speed that have been proven in the past. As for the Falconer, I seem to recall that the Falconer V-12 was proven in boat racing, before it was used in the Thunder plane. Am I incorrect on that? Did the Thunder guys originally rely on a new and unproven design for an engine? I also would be surprise if an engine designer would manufacture a whole new engine for a plane which was very speculative and unlikely to be a big market. I had one flight in the little Mustang and it was quite an impressive plane. If it was half the price and you did not have to build it I might own one.
Bill, my friend. Ryan was approached by the Thunder folks to develop an engine for their project. I believe that the firm order was for 50 engines. At the time, we had done a lot of development for Chevy on their V6 program, all 90 degree V8 technology but 4.4" to remove a section of the block. Ryan went the other direction, 8.8" longer to turn a V8 into a V12. The normally aspirated development was done in a Chevy Suburban as the engine was direct bolt in. Once base lined, dyno development and certification began. Gearbox development along with the designs of Thunder resulted. Ryan used his experience and connections to develop fuel and ignition control systems, etc.
It was only due to the reduced demand for the Thunder engine that he went back to his roots for additional market to make his investment pay off. He started years ago in Turbo 454's for off shore racing. This was a logical market yet off road, hot rod, etc. opened up many opportunities.
Ryan is a corner stone of the racing engine business and an innovator extrodinaire! If you wanted 2 HP/cube in the 70's, no problem. We used to build 650 HP 305's for the Formula 5000 series and they ran all day.
The Thunder, in my humble opinion, is a great aircraft. Power to weight, exceeds the original and if you have a Falconer supported engine system, you are in luck, my friend.
