This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:27 pm
That article's 7 years old Bela!
The aircraft was notable by its absence at Reno this year. Does anyone have an update on progress?
Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:51 pm
Oops, sorry....
I saw the link, assumed it was a "real" update (not 7 years old!)
and posted it here without reading it! (shame on me...).
Bela P. Havasreti
Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:11 pm
Mike wrote:That article's 7 years old Bela!
The aircraft was notable by its absence at Reno this year. Does anyone have an update on progress?
I don't recall where but among all the pics from Reno this year I recall seeing one of the MB-5 replica in its' hangar at Stead.
Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:04 pm
Mike wrote:That article's 7 years old Bela!
The aircraft was notable by its absence at Reno this year. Does anyone have an update on progress?
I saw it several times sitting outside its T-Hangar this year.
Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:37 pm
A couple of control surfaces , some cowling fastners and it looks good to go. Since 2003 that seems attainable.
Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:25 pm
The photos look like nice workmanship and interesting with the counter -roating props. I looked up the 1946 tests done at Boscome Down on the original. They did give a 460 mph top speed, the stall was given as a eye catching 95 mph. The plane was heavy, about 9400 lbs. i think for the initial test flights it would be good to have more wing area, maybe the short wing would be ok for racing at Reno. I hope it flys, if it can be done safely.
Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:33 pm
A little more history on the MB5 eplica here.
http://www.thehomepylon.net/Marlins_MB5/page18.htm
bf1
Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Bill Greenwood wrote:The plane was heavy, about 9400 lbs. i think for the initial test flights it would be good to have more wing area, maybe the short wing would be ok for racing at Reno. I hope it flys, if it can be done safely.
I can't imagine this thing will weigh 9400#. It is far from an exact replica using modified Mustang wings, vertical and horizontal stabilizers. It has a steel tube fuselage with sheet aluminum covering.
Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:09 am
And he reduced the length of it I think by 6-12 ft IIRC!
Its a magnificent achievement, it really is - but with all that effort you'd think he would have kept the same planform - along with the TSR2 its one of our (us Brits) great 'what ifs'...
Brandon and Bela- nice to see ya posting - how are the Sixs coming on chaps?
TT
(Ben)
Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:31 am
I saw it sitting in its hangar at Reno this year.It looks the same as it did the first time I saw it in 2003.It doesnt look like its ever gonna fly.I dont blame them for that.Its obvious that when you compare it to the old photos of the real MB5 that the lines just arent right.Would take a pilot with very big Bollas to fly it.
Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:40 pm
TEXANTOMCAT wrote:Brandon and Bela- nice to see ya posting - how are the Sixs coming on chaps?
Busy gutting the cockpit for the moment. Looks more disassembled than ever!
Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:26 pm
TEXANTOMCAT wrote:And he reduced the length of it I think by 6-12 ft IIRC!
Its a magnificent achievement, it really is - but with all that effort you'd think he would have kept the same planform - along with the TSR2 its one of our (us Brits) great 'what ifs'...
Brandon and Bela- nice to see ya posting - how are the Sixs coming on chaps?
TT
(Ben)
Still working on the accessory section (acquired a few bits and pieces
a short while back that I was missing for same). Been working on
my other airplane as well, and that has taken some "quality time" away
from the SNJ....
Bela P. Havasreti
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.