Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Wed Oct 09, 2024 5:20 am

A Boeing B-17 "Flyign Fortress" Taxies To The Parking Area At The 91St Bomb Group Base In Bassingbourne, England. The Planes Parked On The Grass Include (Left To Right) A Vultee L-5 [Crossed Out, Replaced With] Piper L-4, Noorduyn C-64, Republic P-47 And (U.S. Air Force Number 69428AC)


42-75151 (MSN 3502) 82nd FS [MX-L], 78th FG, 8th AF, Duxford, Station 357; HQ Squadron [MX-L], 1st Combat Bomb Wing, 8th AF, Bassingbourn, Station 121; Used as a formation monitor; Crashed 15May45 near Bassingbourn; The pilot came in upside down which was a usual trick with the intention of flipping over at the last minute. Pilot killed

Image

Image

Image

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Wed Oct 09, 2024 6:55 am

Lovely shots: went to an airshow there years ago (1978?) - I think even then it was an army airfield with little flying.

Spelling is "Bassingbourn" - no "e".

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:59 pm

It would be neat (and affordable) to have an L-4 in 8th AF markings from some group.
I have seen the main photo before, but I don't think I've seen any closeups of a BG L-4 (or a UC-78 for that matter).

I can't imagine what they would have been used for...too small for parts hauling, VFR only (so not a lot of god in an English winter), not much of a trainer if you are used to anything heavy.
Used as a flying staff car for quick trips to Pinetree?

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:34 am

JohnB wrote:It would be neat (and affordable) to have an L-4 in 8th AF markings from some group.
I have seen the main photo before, but I don't think I've seen any closeups of a BG L-4 (or a UC-78 for that matter).

I can't imagine what they would have been used for...too small for parts hauling, VFR only (so not a lot of god in an English winter), not much of a trainer if you are used to anything heavy.
Used as a flying staff car for quick trips to Pinetree?


The L-4 was quite useful as an elevated observation platform for artillery. They could spot and correct land based and vessel based fire support. They were also quite useful for liaison between various HQ and field units, so commanders could meet and coordinate with other elements. Being capable of austere operations they could land on roads and field and allow face to face meetings.

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 11:44 am

Sandiego 89

I understand what the L-4 did in the Army (as opposed to the USAAF) as a liaison and artillery spotter...my comments were asking why a bomb group had one.
As the photo above shows, the B-17 group had one with its markings.

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 12:39 pm

JohnB wrote:Sandiego 89

I understand what the L-4 did in the Army (as opposed to the USAAF) as a liaison and artillery spotter...my comments were asking why a bomb group had one.
As the photo above shows, the B-17 group had one with its markings.


I'm assuming it would have been used in a communications role?

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:38 pm

Why would that taxiway have been built with all the curves in it? I thought taxiways were normally straight.

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:01 pm

Well, you do like to zig zag down the taxiway if you are in a taildragger... :-D

Phil

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 6:28 pm

quemerford wrote:I'm assuming it would have been used in a communications role?


But as I pointed out in my post, it doesn't have much utility (in part due to wx), capacity or payload, and any training utility would be minimal.
For transportation there were trains nearby (no place in the UK is far from trains), and trucks, cars and Jeeps were assigned to the unit, so communicate with whom?.

Even in the war, units weren't just allotted things willy-nilly, there would of had a reason for them having it.
I can see the UC-64 and UC-78, but a Cub?

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Thu Oct 10, 2024 7:51 pm

Dave Homewood wrote:Why would that taxiway have been built with all the curves in it? I thought taxiways were normally straight.


Image

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Fri Oct 11, 2024 2:19 am

Curved taxiways would be perfect for taildraggers surely?

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:51 pm

Image

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Fri Oct 11, 2024 5:34 pm

phil65 wrote:Well, you do like to zig zag down the taxiway if you are in a taildragger... :-D

Phil

In the UK at that time they were not called taxiways they were perimeter (peri) tracks as originally airfields were just that fields, and the perimeter track was laid around the perimeter of the odd collection of odd shaped ancient fields that had been purchased/commandeered leaving a landing ground in the middle. When hard runways were laid they would sometimes cut across the existing peritracks and additional ones would be laid parallel to the new runway. The need for two or three runways to fit in with the UK's variable winds resulted in some odd layouts with only short lengths of parallel peritracks.

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Sat Oct 12, 2024 7:47 am

Wow, that's a DB-7, BJ473. :shock: Great find! :drink3:

Re: Bassingbourne HQ Squadron

Sun Oct 13, 2024 7:51 am

Well, it's WIX and somebody ALWAYS comes through...

28285229424_e0b8774895_b.jpg

43346996750_b45d1f51a9_h 1.jpg

45112092172_0aa69b6935_h 1.jpg

45160858451_e1a2044004_o 1.jpg



C2j
Attachments
B-17-PICT1720.jpg
Post a reply