Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:42 pm

Any ideas?
Attachments
31387664_10214317535144748_8938589621638638254_n.jpg
31387664_10214317535144748_8938589621638638254_n.jpg (61.58 KiB) Viewed 2589 times

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:53 pm

I seem to recall this was subject of a loooong thread a while back, without a definitive answer.

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:04 pm

quemerford wrote:I seem to recall this was subject of a loooong thread a while back, without a definitive answer.


On Flypast wasn't it?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 1:54 pm

Hooligan2 wrote:
quemerford wrote:I seem to recall this was subject of a loooong thread a while back, without a definitive answer.


On Flypast wasn't it?


I gave up on Flypast years ago so not there. PPRuNe maybe?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:13 pm

It was somewhere I post, so either here or FlyPast (before their forum pretty much died).

No definitive answer.
Some guys kept saying it was an "X" with so many major changes, which taken as a whole, would not make it an "X" any longer.
Some guys think modifying an airworthy aircraft is as simple as chopping a '32 Ford.

The fixed gear dates it a narrow window since retractable gear came fairly quickly after monoplanes became big.
And the radial does not make it look European to me.

If it were American, I'd call it a Seversky, but I can't find a Severely To match it.

To me, it also looks like an early Nakajima, the record setting Mitsubishi Ki-15 Kamikaze from 1937, or a progenitor of the Aichi D3A "Val".

IIRC, Some called it a film prop, but I don't think so since studios could usually borrow real aircraft like the early B-17, A-17 and Seversky SEV-S2 used in Test Pilot.
Last edited by JohnB on Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 3:27 pm

Maybe it was Flypast after all - it was obviously a few more years ago than I thought :(

For sure it's a lovely-looking machine and I'd love to find out the story behind the image, whether it's a well-executed piece of modelling/Photoshop or a genuine aircraft.

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:40 pm

A Fokker perhaps- or a fixed-gear Curtiss Hawk 75?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Wed Aug 17, 2022 8:45 pm

To me it looks like a Northrop product.

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:48 am

Sure it was Flypast, think I was still working so that's pre-2018.

The other thread trawled just about every manufacturer people could think of in the US, Japan, right around Europe... nothing seemed to quite fit. "We was proper stumped..."

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 9:44 am

Vultee?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 10:15 am

I think we run the risk of repeating all of the suggestions made on the other forum. I think that run went through the usual (Lockheed, Ryan etc), then to obscure Russian, Japanese and French types and so unless someone knows for sure what it is, I don't think we'll get any further.

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 11:45 am

Could this be the Granville Gee Bee R-6 (now in Mexico)?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:03 pm

old iron wrote:Could this be the Granville Gee Bee R-6 (now in Mexico)?


Spats too small, fin too large. Anyone have a link to that other thread?

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 12:42 pm

old iron wrote:Could this be the Granville Gee Bee R-6 (now in Mexico)?

In that similar school, I was thinking the military version of the Hawks Miller HM-1...the Miller HM-1, but it had retracts...sigh... pop2

Re: Not a warbird, but what?

Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:03 pm

I remember the original Flypast thread. As the search function there is pretty abysmal I tried another way and found this four page thread on a different forum about this image: https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/m ... aft.48498/

I'm pretty sure that the Flypast consensus ended up as 'unknown', I'll go and have a look at this thread I found now to see if they did any better!

Edited to add: no conclusive answer there unfortunately, but it's worth a read to see the options. It's definitively not a Fokker D.XXI variant.
Post a reply