This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:30 pm
Both were roughly in the 1,000 mile range if I recall. Wonder how much further with the added fuel tanks. if, of course, they aren't napalm.

Originally posted by Mark Allen
Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:52 pm
One of the RNZAF Corsair photos in your Pacific thread has the same load-out.

RNZAF Vought F4U-1D Corsair (NZ5410), flown by a pilot of 24SQN, landing at Jacquinot Bay, New Britain on the 20th May 1945.
Thu Aug 22, 2019 4:54 am
Ferry tanks?Not for combat maybe?
Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Spitty wrote:Ferry tanks? Not for combat maybe?
That would be my guess.
Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:11 am
Wondering what kind of drag index and or power settings they used with those things installed. I'm sure if they were just trying to "get there", neither mattered.
Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:06 pm
I'm curious about the corsair configuration. The tanks aren't the same size and I would assume they would exhibit asymmetrical drag. Is this offset by the engine torque or is there some other effect in play?
Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:19 pm
I thought the Corsair setup was three tanks....... two smaller outboards, and one large centerline. Hard to tell in pics.
Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:49 pm
Scott Rose wrote:I'm curious about the corsair configuration. The tanks aren't the same size and I would assume they would exhibit asymmetrical drag. Is this offset by the engine torque or is there some other effect in play?
yes as Ag said, the three closely spaced stores stations were all plumbed to mount external fuel tanks. You just can't see the port side tank in those phots as the larger centerline tank obscures its view.
2 tanks were much more common.
Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:25 pm
Anyone know the capacity of the big centerline tank? 100 or more gallons?
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.