Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

RN Hellcat crash site in Norway found - Tirpitz raid

Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:20 pm

Tirpitz raid RN Hellcat wreckage found in northern Norway, site visited by relatives of the pilot that died in the crash.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-hampshire-46922010/ww2-wreckage-found-by-grandson-on-norwegian-mountainside

.

Re: RN Hellcat crash site in Norway found - Tirpitz raid

Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:13 pm

Not much is left. I wish the remaining pieces could be collected and given to Planes of Fame museum. Maybe one day they will have enough bits and pieces to put a Hellcat together to replace the one they lost.
I suppose this Hellcat will remains there as it’s a war grave.

Re: RN Hellcat crash site in Norway found - Tirpitz raid

Thu Jan 24, 2019 10:10 am

marine air wrote:Not much is left. I wish the remaining pieces could be collected and given to Planes of Fame museum. Maybe one day they will have enough bits and pieces to put a Hellcat together to replace the one they lost.
I suppose this Hellcat will remains there as it’s a war grave.


I'm sure the Royal Navy would have an opinion about that.

Re: RN Hellcat crash site in Norway found - Tirpitz raid

Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:39 pm

I have a question about situations like this in general. Take any military crash site (airplane, ship, vehicle, train, whatever). If the all of the occupants' remains were recovered and given a proper burial, and all that remains is wreckage, is it still a war grave? I thought that designation indicated that the human remains had not been recovered. Not trying to be a wise guy or be disrespectful. I just don't know the answer.

Re: RN Hellcat crash site in Norway found - Tirpitz raid

Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:07 pm

I am of the opinion (for what little it is worth) that when remains have been removed and properly buried or otherwise handled, the aircraft remains are simply bits and pieces of a machine. Those bits and pieces will not last long -- even the Titanic is slowly but surely rusting away, and will be mostly gone within the next century. For substantial aircraft remains, like these, if there is a way for them to have new life, whether in a diorama setting in a museum or as part of a rebuild (whether static or flying), why wouldn't that be an appropriate renewal of the life of a machine as well as a living memorial to the lost airman?
kevin
Post a reply