This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:56 am
Mark, as always some interesting photos. The last photo shows a field elevation of 5391 feet, so it might be Lowry Field in Colorado, near Denver. I'm not sure if it was a navigator's school but it was a training field. Just FYI.
Randy
Sun Jun 26, 2016 10:21 am
Thanks Randy, yes now that makes more sense. Lowry Field would be more logical.
M
Sun Jun 26, 2016 10:23 am
Both large hangars remain with "Wings Over the Rockies" museum located in one.
Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:55 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:
SO cool to see some of the last active B-10s in service! This one is B-10B 35-235:
Joe Baugher wrote:235 (MSN 650) damaged at Las Vegas Army Gunnery School, Las Vegas AAF, NV Nov 18, 1942
AAIR lists it as a taxiing accident and refers to it as a B-10BM, one of several so converted; did the "M" suffix denote target towing or something else?
Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:55 am
Chris Brame wrote:Mark Allen M wrote:
SO cool to see some of the last active B-10s in service! This one is B-10B 35-235:
Joe Baugher wrote:235 (MSN 650) damaged at Las Vegas Army Gunnery School, Las Vegas AAF, NV Nov 18, 1942
AAIR lists it as a taxiing accident and refers to it as a B-10BM, one of several so converted; did the "M" suffix denote target towing or something else?
Chris, in Martin Aircraft 1909-1960 by Breihan, Piet & Mason, the M designation is mentioned in this on page 55:
"Despite a number of disputes between Air Corps materiel officers and Martin over design and construction defects in the B-10 series, 119 of the 151 planes purchased during 1932-35 were still in service in the Spring of 1940. Redesignated B-10M and B-12AM, most were assigned to target-towing and training duties, though seventeen planes in the Philippines were still in combat status."
It is likely that some B-10B models were also used and got the M designation, as you suggest.
Randy
Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:01 am
Hey, thanks for all the AT-6 shots, Mark. Since Z-7 is identifiable as an AT-6A-NT, I will make the bold (foolish?) assumption that the others are as well.
cheers
Doug
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.