Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:22 am
Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:30 am
Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:45 am
Mon Jan 04, 2016 7:24 am
quemerford wrote:Felipe,
You need the aircraft individual record cards from AFHRA at Maxwell AFB: available to view on-site or also on microfilm roll. From the s'ns you have there, ordering will be easy - probably on just one microfilm roll. For those s/n not known, you'll have to trawl through a lot of 'not applicable' aircraft data. However it can be a lot of fun digging up this type of information.
It does look like you might be able to pin your starting list down a bit though - from your brief list it looks like the FAC aircraft may have all been F-47D-40-RA subtypes and if that is the case you'll slim your list down a great deal and at least have a chance of finding them all.
quemerford wrote:Interesting subject and in sore need of a book to describe it all!
Tulio wrote:Felipe,
If you contact me off-board, and provide your e-mail information, I can send you all I have on Colombian P-47s, data and images (from different sources).
Saludos,
Tulio
Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 am
Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:25 pm
Pathfinder wrote:Just regarding C-47/DC-3 types...The military serial number in not always constant in transfers. The one number that appears to remain a constant is the manufacturer's Construction Number. After military service, the manufacturers C/N will likely follow the plane like the VIN number on a car...vs. the "license plate" or tail number on the plane.
Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:32 pm
Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:34 pm
Pathfinder wrote:Just regarding C-47/DC-3 types...The military serial number in not always constant in transfers. The one number that appears to remain a constant is the manufacturer's Construction Number. After military service, the manufacturers C/N will likely follow the plane like the VIN number on a car...vs. the "license plate" or tail number on the plane.
Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:29 pm
Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:56 pm
Pathfinder wrote:Another number to understand is the 0- tail number which indicates an aircraft that is older than ten years in service.
Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:10 am
Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:57 am
Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:04 pm
Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:57 am
Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:54 am
quemerford wrote:It sounds to me like you are doing well on the latter course!