Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

"NO SMOKING" ...

Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:47 pm

This thread is dedicated to a certain CAF fuel truck gal (along with many other duties I'm sure) who has shown passion, commitment and leadership to her organization. She has shown by her dedication a fine example of someone all of us would want as a fellow member of any organization. I'm quite convinced the Commemorative Air Force is fortunate to have you aboard and are very proud of you and your commitment to the mission.

Source (U.S. Air Force Photos) Fold3 archives

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:26 pm

Great post Mark. Interesting collection & topic.

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:33 pm

Thx Drew, as you know ... Ya can't fly em if you don't fuel em! An unappreciated endeavor for sure.

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:49 pm

Source (U.S. Air Force Photos) Fold3 archives


Image
42-5526 P-61A-1-NO 8) - survived :D until 31 August 1945 :( when it was condemned to salvage :axe:

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:52 am

Yeah great stuff as always Mark.
There is a whole lot more work to these things, than there is flying to be had.

Andy Scott

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:19 am

DH82EH wrote:Yeah great stuff as always Mark.
There is a whole lot more work to these things, than there is flying to be had.

Andy Scott


Amen, a lot of folks forget that it's the crew chief 8) and ground maintenance laborers :D :drinkers: that let the pilots fly their planes and trust 'em to not fold, spindle, nor mutilate their aircraft pop2

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:27 am

Anyone have a wartime (GMC?) fuel truck as seen above?
They seem to have been pretty standardized in both chassis and fuel tank and pump unit.

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:45 am

Ground crew pictures are always interesting. Great collection as usual, Mark.

I can't help but think of all the effort it took to refine all that gas and ship it halfway around the world. Staggering.

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:53 am

Can't help but to post more refueling photos because the demand is off the charts for riveting drama portrayed in these type of photos :wink:
.. and sorry for no information, just too darn lazy today ... :axe:
More to come for those who are sitting on the edge of their seats.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:14 am

Fantastic photo set!

The P-51 must be one of very few Allied fighters that you can re-fuel with both feet on the ground!

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:42 pm

<Blushing>

Thank you for the wonderful photos!

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:49 pm

Ah! don't bother with the blushing stuff, keep making them blush on their side :wink:

Here's even more gas madness!!!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:08 pm

Mark Allen M wrote:Image


What's going on here?

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:41 pm

Superb set of photos Mark.

I am very curious about this one, this Thunderbolt seems to be wearing what looks like RNZAF markings! I assume it's an RAF roundel painted over a factory-applied US star and bar? And yet the groundcrew chap seems to be in American garb.

Image

Re: "NO SMOKING" ...

Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:02 pm

Dave Homewood wrote:Superb set of photos Mark.

I am very curious about this one, this Thunderbolt seems to be wearing what looks like RNZAF markings! I assume it's an RAF roundel painted over a factory-applied US star and bar? And yet the groundcrew chap seems to be in American garb.

Looks Brazilian to me...

:partyman:
Post a reply