Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:56 pm
Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:51 pm
Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:51 pm
Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:28 pm
F6FFan wrote:63-7742 was his assigned RF-4, the third RF-4C ever built coincidentally, it apparently lived at McDD for a while, being built into a C, D and I think an E before being rebuilt into an RF-4C configuration.
F6FFan
Thu Sep 19, 2013 5:48 pm
JohnB wrote:F6FFan wrote:63-7742 was his assigned RF-4, the third RF-4C ever built coincidentally, it apparently lived at McDD for a while, being built into a C, D and I think an E before being rebuilt into an RF-4C configuration.
F6FFan
It would have been the 5th RF-4C built (including prototypes) after 62-12200/201 and after the first two in its Block 17: 63-7740-41.
If true, it would be interesting to know 7742's history. Exactly what changes were made to make it an E (working gun? Slotted stabilizer etc?)...and when?
A ship three places down the line...63-7445, served as the YF-4E development aircraft.
Your theory is somewhat the reverse history of the well-known (and preserved) 62-12200 now at the AF museum...it began life as a F-4B, became YRF-110A then became the aerodynamic prototype for the F-4E.
I'm sure there is a Phantom expert out there that might know more. Does it survive?
Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:24 pm
Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:55 pm
Sun May 04, 2014 9:29 pm
RAMC181 wrote:Sad to report that both 63-7742 and 65-0852 have apparently been scrapped at AMARC since the middle of February, along with a further 42 RF-4Cs.
Sun May 11, 2014 3:51 pm