Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:50 pm
Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:37 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:06 am
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:36 pm
wendovertom wrote:Awesome! It really is too bad that there are not more of this type that survived and could be brought back to flying status.
Tom P.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:49 pm
Warbird Kid wrote:
To me... the future are full reproductions. Reproduction of parts for the powerplant and airframe alike. One only needs to look at what the classic car industry does. Multiple aftermarket shops that produce specific new-build parts. While aircraft have waaaaay higher tolerances and regulations, it's my hope that we'll be seeing whole new fuselages, wings, engines, and everything in-between.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:21 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:14 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:48 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:53 pm
Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:54 am
TriangleP wrote: Would be very interesting to hear from someone at Vintage Radials describe the whole process to resurrect the BMW 801 for Allen's Fw190. Certification of an exact reproduction would be expensive, but the resources a few of these guys have would make it happen.
Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:38 am
Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:49 am
Chappie wrote:I agree with Rob and TriangleP about reproductions, although I'm not sure I could get excited about a 100% reproduction WWII aircraft. Personally I'd like to see a certain percentage of the aircraft original. Not sure what number I could put on it though.
What I would like to see is the numerous flyable original warbirds sitting static like in Palm Springs and Kalamazoo (??) returned to the sky and replaced with repos.
Chappie
Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:08 am
Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:27 am
N77657 wrote:I was under the impression that most, if not all, of the P-51's now flying were reproductions except for the data plate, engine, prop, etc. Is there any P-51 airframe (not including the engine, prop, etc.) out there that is more than say 50% original?
Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:25 pm