Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:10 pm
Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:49 am
Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:14 am
Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:34 pm
CoastieJohn wrote:Hot off the press.....just announced this morning.
http://www.uscgnews.com/go/doc/4007/168 ... r-70-years
Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:42 pm
Noha307 wrote:CoastieJohn wrote:Hot off the press.....just announced this morning.
http://www.uscgnews.com/go/doc/4007/168 ... r-70-years
Way to go guys!
So, I know it's early to ask, but is there a plan for the Duck? Glacier Girl II?
The human remains present an issue. I would never restore the airframe, or any airframe found with human remains, to airworthy status even after they have been removed. It seems dishonorable and irreverent to their memory. Even to restore it at all would require me to deal with a major moral debate.
Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:54 pm
Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:57 pm
Wildchild wrote:Or, who says we have to restore it?
Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:14 pm
Wildchild wrote:Or, who says we have to restore it? Here's what I mean:
Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:50 pm
Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:12 pm
JohnB wrote:Before we start picking out paint schemes....
Remember, just because it was last seen fairly intact doesn't mean it still is.
Remember the Glacier Girl B-17....
Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:56 pm
New York Times wrote:Commander Blow said that recovering Lieutenant Pritchard and Petty Officer Bottoms would mean that all of the Coast Guard’s missing members from all wars would be accounted for.
Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:10 pm
Noha307 wrote:Congrats!Your efforts made it to the New York Times: Search Crew Finds World War II Plane That Crashed in Greenland
How does it feel?
I found one claim in the article very intriguing:New York Times wrote:Commander Blow said that recovering Lieutenant Pritchard and Petty Officer Bottoms would mean that all of the Coast Guard’s missing members from all wars would be accounted for.
Anyone care to chime in? I hoping one of the WIX gurus could double-check that fact. Does this mean that there still may be missing Coast Guardsmen from non-wartime periods?
Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:22 pm
Wildchild wrote:JohnB wrote:Before we start picking out paint schemes....
Remember, just because it was last seen fairly intact doesn't mean it still is.
Remember the Glacier Girl B-17....
What did they do with 17 anyways? Leave it there?
Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:56 pm
Wildchild wrote:JohnB wrote:Before we start picking out paint schemes....
Remember, just because it was last seen fairly intact doesn't mean it still is.
Remember the Glacier Girl B-17....
What did they do with 17 anyways? Leave it there?
Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:53 pm
cooper9411 wrote:Wildchild wrote:JohnB wrote:Before we start picking out paint schemes....
Remember, just because it was last seen fairly intact doesn't mean it still is.
Remember the Glacier Girl B-17....
What did they do with 17 anyways? Leave it there?
If not mistaken, the first plane they found was one of the B-17's and when they reached it, it was smashed from all the weight of sno/ice. They did remove some pieces from it for souvenirs. They have not to this day located the other B-17 which is surely in the same condition as the other. After that is when it was decided to search for one of the P-38's (which they only located one).