Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

legislative threat to warbirds House bill (H.R. 4310)

Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:30 pm

18 April: Another legislative threat to warbirds: A proposed amendment to a House bill (H.R. 4310) would effectively stop the US Department of Defense from providing aircraft, or even spare parts, to civilian individuals or organizations, if those aircraft or parts are destined to be part of an airworthy aircraft. Please see our Threats to Warbirds page for more information.


From Warbird Alley http://www.warbirdalley.com/threats.htm

Re: legislative threat to warbirds House bill (H.R. 4310)

Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:11 pm

Vulture wrote:
18 April: Another legislative threat to warbirds: A proposed amendment to a House bill (H.R. 4310) would effectively stop the US Department of Defense from providing aircraft, or even spare parts, to civilian individuals or organizations, if those aircraft or parts are destined to be part of an airworthy aircraft. Please see our Threats to Warbirds page for more information.


From Warbird Alley http://www.warbirdalley.com/threats.htm

There is currently 4 threads on this page on this.
I know it's important but it will get confusing trying to follow all these different threads.

Re: legislative threat to warbirds House bill (H.R. 4310)

Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:21 pm

And does anyone have the name of the muppet who proposed this so we can go after him??

Re: legislative threat to warbirds House bill (H.R. 4310)

Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:09 pm

Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH)


He's on the House Armed Services Committee, and , oh yeah, NMUSAF is in his district. I'm sure it's just a coincidence.

Re: legislative threat to warbirds House bill (H.R. 4310)

Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:16 pm

with all the crap going on you would think this guy could find something else to do with his time????
Post a reply