This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:47 am
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/c131regi ... 50301.htmlI was just over in the shops. It wasn't over there. Anyone know where it went?
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:21 am
Did they scrap it ?
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:49 am
Wow! Looks like it was sold to an owner in Kenosha, WI.
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:50 am
Being serious, here. Can you find out if he has an OK to fly it ?
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:52 am
Yeah will do!
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:54 am
RickH wrote:Being serious, here. Can you find out if he has an OK to fly it ?
A flying C-131 would be VERY nice.
Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:08 am
The CAF operates one as well
Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:28 am
If you scroll about half way down there are pics of it being moved. You can see that whoever bought it took it apart as I am sure it will need a good bit of work to fly. I am not sure how a C-131 comes apart, but it doesn't appear to be cut. Also notice the attempt to cushion the move. So it at least will be a display aircraft. I wonder if this was because they recieved the other C-131?
http://www.ruudleeuw.com/guestphotos-19.htm
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:35 am
My father's favorite plane....this coming from a guy who flew B-17s, C-47s, C-124s, YC-122s, C-82s,...
He flew VT-29s when they were sent to bases as "hacks" replacing C-47s.
Hope it has a good home. Convairs are anothoer of those types that we take for granted, but they're becoming thin on the ground.
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:42 am
Anyone have any idea why they would deaccession this one? I know they have the crazy two headed sim thing, but not a line flyer. Maybe they figured that was enough?
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:44 am
I like them too. There was a cargo outfit that used to still fly them into PIT once in a while. We used to get some cool airplanes over at the cargo area. Beech 18's, DC-3's, Convairs, and even a C-133 once.
Stangstung, I remember hearing a story about the airplane long ago and how they wanted a different one, but I can't say I remember all of the details. Personally I think it would have looked nice all polished up
Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:55 am
mustangdriver wrote:If you scroll about half way down there are pics of it being moved. You can see that whoever bought it took it apart as I am sure it will need a good bit of work to fly. I am not sure how a C-131 comes apart, but it doesn't appear to be cut. Also notice the attempt to cushion the move. So it at least will be a display aircraft. I wonder if this was because they recieved the other C-131?
http://www.ruudleeuw.com/guestphotos-19.htm
Chris, just to clarify by "they" you mean the NMUSAF? If so where is the other one coming from?
Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:10 pm
Well they have that NC-131 over in R&D but it is hardly an example of a standard 131
Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:36 pm
mustangdriver wrote:Well they have that NC-131 over in R&D but it is hardly an example of a standard 131
That doesn't seem to bother the NMUSAF.
The VC-54 they have is hardly representative...same for the VC-118. Same with the Lockheed twin...the C-60 perhaps isn't the best choice to represent the many types (B-34, AT-28/29, AT-18s, etc) of Lockheed twins used. I guess it's a question of space.
Hint: they need to buy one of the C-54s for sale in the UK to represent a Berlin Airlift aircraft. Still, they need a T-29 since it was the most numerous variant of the Convair propliner series in service and did the nav trainer role from the mid 50s to the early 70s.
Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:45 pm
I agree about the Berlin Airlift C-54! Also they did just get a Lockheed B-37 into the shop
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.