Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:31 pm

Searched and didn't find this on WIX. Looks like it's right out of "Joe 90".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7jENWKgMPY&feature=related

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:13 am

Uhm... that's got to be a fake video
Last edited by Mike Robinson on Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:51 am

TheAviator wrote:Uhm... that's got to be a fake video

No.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piasecki_PA-97

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:24 am

Oh my g

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:43 am

There are not only aircraft we know, but there are aircraft we know we don't know, and then there are aircraft that we don't know we don't know. ;)

Sadly, entirely due to poor stress calculations, an interesting project foundered and more importantly a pilot was killed.

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:31 pm

What I don't understand is why in the phuck the forestry service would have been throwing money away on a contraption like that in the first place as I wouldn't believe they should havbe anything to do with harvesting trees as that would be a commerical operation.

Giving Piasecki money could be a reason but how can that be justified for a federal agency to be investing I mean throwing away money for something that would benefit tree harvesters bottom line and is not the job of governement on a silly azz contraption like that which if one engine (even if they had used turbines in later developments) quits it woul be hair raising to say the least especially under a load.

Forestry idiots should have paid the pilots family for something they fostered.

.
Last edited by Mike Robinson on Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:51 pm

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 001888697#

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:09 am

It's always unfortunate when a pilot loses their life, especially in a forty million dollar pile of surplus helicopters, high-tension power line towers and a giant gas bag. I just hope the engineers didn't slap their collective foreheads after the accident and say, "Oh right, wind!"

Every time I see the video of the PA-97 I think of some of those early, unsuccessful flying machines. Right around the 0:41 mark here you can see there really are no new ideas...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEdtvct6Tf0

-Tim

Re: Piasecki PA97, Umm Wow??

Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:44 pm

Mike wrote:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2668113119001888697#


At least I know understand the "Why" of it.

Tim
Post a reply