Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:16 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:44 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:15 am
warbird1 wrote:A few questions:
1) Is this a separate project from the Corsair on the pole at Bridgeport? It sounds like it is. If so, I'm not familiar with this project, any details
warbird1 wrote:(2) Why, all of a sudden, is this project going to make manufacturing new spars feasible when in the past it hasn't been? Is it a technology thing or a money thing? Surely, one of the multi-millionaire warbird restorers like Allen, Weeks, Lewis, etc. would have used this by now if it was so readily available. How come not?
warbird1 wrote:(3) Will these new "machined" spars be airworthy in the eyes of the FAA?
warbird1 wrote:) Who is that guy being interviewed and what is his background?
Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:31 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:04 am
Is this Craig guy primarily a pilot, mechanic or engineer? What is his area of expertise?
Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:07 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:14 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:28 am
oz rb fan wrote:arent the guys at wangarrata(oz) doing new spars for the one they have with a cut spar?
Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:56 am
Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:20 pm
Rob Mears wrote:If he succeeds at turning out airworthy main spars for the F4U, he'll have done what no one else could. It may take decades, but sometimes a "whole lot of heart" can acheive things that are otherwise unobtainable to those with a lot of money, but a passing fancy.
FWIW, the original spar cap for the F4U was a continuous chunk of extruded aluminum about sixteen feet long that was formed into its unique shape by what I believe were massive rollers. That original tooling has long since been destroyed, and you can just imagine what it would take to duplicate that process and successfully turn out a precision-made piece. Many years ago, a well known warbird restorer once figured it would take a million bucks just to tool up for the task, much less to produce anything. Even today's market wouldn't support that kind of herculean effort IMO.
Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:29 pm
Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:43 pm
Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:47 pm
Jerry O'Neill wrote:Craig has a structurally undamaged, non-airworthy spar from a different aircraft that was used for the measuring and dis-assembly for scanning.
Jerry
Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:54 pm
Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Jerry O'Neill wrote:I think it's pretty much up to some of the sponsors he has, with the economy the way it is, money's a little tough. The educational aspect of the process he has been working has been a benefit to the project as sponsors see it as a means to an end. I don't think it will be too long though.
Jerry