Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Lackland AFB P-82 Photos

Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:41 pm

In another thread, there was a request for some current photos of the Lackland AFB P-82.

Although there aren't that many photos here, I spent quite a bit of time this evening looking as close as I could without actually climbing up on it.

My assessment is that it actually looks to be in pretty decent condition, all things considered. It's obviously in a cocoon of numerous layers of paint, but I could only find a single area of obvious corrosion (see photo below). Obviously, there's a lot more in there -- there has to be -- but I have certainly seen static displays and gate guards that look a lot worse than this.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Here's a bubble of corrosion on the left side of the righthand fuselage. For some perspective, it is about the size of a credit card.
Image

Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:46 pm

That's good to see. All I can say is that I hope that they treat it with the respect it deserves and never let a crew go at it with electric sanders like this:
Image
(Same AFB just under two years ago...)

Ryan

Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:48 pm

That thing looks to be in awesome shape! If the USAF still has that one in their possession, why'd they have to be such schmucks about the CAF P-82?

Randy, how long did it take you to find that corrosion? Thanks for the effort "above & beyond the call."

Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:50 pm

RyanShort1 wrote: never let a crew go at it with electric sanders like this


That's the typical way I've seen most AFB static displays be repainted. They just don't have the time/manpower/money to have it media blasted prior to re-paint.

Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:51 pm

Rajay wrote:Randy, how long did it take you to find that corrosion? Thanks for the effort "above & beyond the call."


Not long, just a couple of minutes...but I looked all over the place, and that is literally the only visible corrosion that I could find. I laid down on my back and looked at the belly and didn't see anything there, where I expected to see some.

Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:39 am

Sadly whatever the amount of corrosion and I would imagine there to be plenty, this beautiful airplane’s fate is sealed.

Dan

Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:43 am

yah, but at least it is well sealed!!! :wink:

that is until the AF bids out her repainting to the lowest bidder and they pick up a crew from a Home Depot parking lot and hand them electric sanders a nail file and a can of Krylon!

EEEEEKKK :hide:

Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:26 pm

RyanShort1 wrote:That's good to see. All I can say is that I hope that they treat it with the respect it deserves and never let a crew go at it with electric sanders like this:
Image
(Same AFB just under two years ago...)

Ryan


I agree that this is not the best way to do the job, but I have seen much worse done to flying warbirds with all due respect.

Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:53 pm

mustangdriver wrote:
RyanShort1 wrote:That's good to see. All I can say is that I hope that they treat it with the respect it deserves and never let a crew go at it with electric sanders like this:
Image
(Same AFB just under two years ago...)

Ryan


I agree that this is not the best way to do the job, but I have seen much worse done to flying warbirds with all due respect.


I have the AF museum do alot worse, for alot longer. I would like to know what you think you have seen done worse to a fly Warbird ?

Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:01 am

I have seen many risks taken in order to go flying over safety that far exceed a method of sanding the wing on a static aircraft.

Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:03 am

Rajay wrote:That thing looks to be in awesome shape! If the USAF still has that one in their possession, why'd they have to be such schmucks about the CAF P-82?


They didn't want something that they own sold.
Post a reply