Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:53 am
Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:35 am
Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:37 am
mike furline wrote:They were all under powered.
Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:38 am
Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:31 pm
Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:52 pm
N3Njeff wrote:Dam Whittle, if it was not for him, we would still be traveling by 3350's!!!
Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:43 pm
Kyleb wrote:N3Njeff wrote:Dam Whittle, if it was not for him, we would still be traveling by 3350's!!!
I disagree. I think we'd probably have the 4360 sorted out by now...
Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:45 pm
Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:18 am
dhfan wrote:If it wasn't for the last one, (and I know what it is 'cos I was there so I'll keep quiet) I would have guessed they were the first engines to actually aviate.

With any luck maybe a fuel efficient XR-7755.
Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:50 pm
Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:59 am
Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:34 am
engguy wrote:All those stinking jets belong in museums. Bring back the recips now. Much better fuel economy, and just plain sound better. And since we all know that with proper design a piston plane can pretty much cruise with a jet, look at the P51, and thats old school.
Walrus 7 wrote:You know I'm a big fan of your work, but I have to question the statement that Whittle invented the jet engine. That's a bit like saying that James Cook discovered Australia. Each claimed credit, but both were just adding to the knowledge discovered by others.
To my mind, the inventor of the jet engine was Romanian Henri Coanda, who exhibited his jet-powered aeroplane at the Paris Exposition in 1910. Yes, that's right, only seven years after the Wright Brothers, and a long time before Whittle. His "air-reactive" engine powered an unmanned aircraft on one flight in October 1910.
Coanda also framed one of the two main principles of flight that explain the production of lift.
Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:57 am
Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:53 am
Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:13 pm