Switch to full style
This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Tom Cathcart's F7U

Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:07 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:18 pm

What's the story on this? Is it now with the MOF Museum?

Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:26 pm

Tom pulled this F7U out of a park in eastern Washington 10+ years ago and has been slowly restoring it to flight condition! When he got it to KPAE he serviced it and fired up the engines :!: :!: :shock: :shock: 8) 8) :supz: :supz:

id love to see that thing fly!

Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:01 pm

:D :D :D

Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:22 am

I have a HUGE ammount of respect for what he is doing - THAT is dedication. But from the little that I know about Cutlasses
they were a death trap. He's not really going to fly that thing, is he?
Last edited by Dan Jones on Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:23 am

Will take someone with BIG brass nomex covered balls to fly this Gutless Cutlass i say.

Whos brave enough to stand up and do it i wonder nowdays?

Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:31 am

Agreed, it will take BIG BIG STAINLESS STEEL ONES to fly that thing and if it happens I for sure will be there! One problem Tom has is that the wing skins are laminated aluminum balsa and they are rotted and corroded to h%ll.

Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:03 am

Interestingly enough, the new issue of FLIGHT JOURNAL showed up in the snail box today and it has quite an article on the Ensign Killer. :shock:

I realy don't think anyone would be dumb enough to try to fly that thing, but I've been wrong before-(I've never met anyone in aviation who walked to work from Midway Island, in spite of what their own personal opinion of themselves was). :wink:

I understand Tom could be courced into parting with it-

????

Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:34 am

Bud would fly it :idea: :shock: :!:

Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:55 am

The main problem with flying the Cutlass was carrier ops, wasn't it? Underpowered, slow to spool up, and the nosegear fully compressed (with serious back injuries) on really hard landings from what I remember reading. It shouldn't be a real bear for a good jet guy to fly the thing on normal runways, but the check-out would be interesting. :shock: That would be just about the ultimate jet warbird on the circuit if it ever flys again.

Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:55 am

That front strut never ceases to amaze me.

Bill.

Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:32 am

looks like an RAF roundel on the inner pylon ? :)

Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:45 pm

Give Bud the manual to study for a few days and he'll fly the snot out of anything.

I'm confused though. The aircraft is at the Museum of Flight restoration building in Everett. I thought they only restored there own stuff there.

Are you sure the aircraft will be flown?

Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:23 pm

I highly recommend finding the latest issue of Flight Journal and reading just how many ways this thing could kill you while you thought you were doing just swell and had no issues playing John Neversweat, fighter pilot.

It was grossly underpowered even after it finally was fitted with it's 'designed for it' J-46's (which made about 60% of the designed thrust) and it was a hydraulics systems nightmare-

Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:37 pm

Serious question if that were to fly would it have a working ejection seat? It is something I've wondered about in jet warbirds before now so this seems like a good time to ask.

.
Post a reply