This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:10 am
With first operational B-29 raids taking place days after D-Day. I'm curious to know, with the Super Fortress coming up on station, what affect did the B-29 have on B-17 and B-24 operations?
Business as usual or were they relegated to other tasks?
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:49 pm
The B-17 and B-24 in the Pacific did not have near the range of the B-29. The B-29's main mission was the bombing of the Japanese mainland(island?) So I doubt it actually had much effect on the B-17 and B-24 employment, as there were still many missions/targets within their range. And B-29s were not Theatre commanded- they were under the direct command of Hap Arnold, so the theatre commanders could not use them to replace B-24s and B-17s, although from time to time B-29 missions would be allotted to keep the theatre commander placated- as he was supplying them with bases and materiels...
Read Curtis LeMay's "Superfortress- The story of the B-29" for more in depth discussion of the employment of the Heavy Bomber in the Asiatic-Pacific Theatre.
Robbie
Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:59 pm
in contrast b-17's saw very little service in the pacific, mostly at the early stage of the war. as to the b-24, it saw heavy service due to superior fuel range. i don't think the arrival of the b-29 curtailed b-24 use at all, not to mention the navy used them as pb4y's
Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:29 pm
All I know is that the -29ers did a hell uv a job, and many aircrew lost their lives, including my uncle who was a Navigator out of Saipan with the 497th. Thanks guys, and Lt.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.