Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:58 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:13 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:14 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:18 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:19 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:21 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:05 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:52 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:02 pm
bdk wrote:I've always ben curious of the reason the windscreen was designed as it was. Anyone know?
Petty Officer Hadley of 800 Squadron was wounded in the face, an ever present danger as the Skua’s windscreen was not armoured, and the pilots often got in very close to the enemy aircraft to inflict as much damage as possible and allow the observer’s machine gun to come into play. Remarkably, Hadley pressed home his attack and shot the Heinkel down, though he caused a scare to the deck crew of Ark Royal. ‘Hadley, one pilot, got shot through the nose and another bullet in his head rest,’ said armourer Ron Jordan. ‘His nose swelled up, it closed his eyes, and he half crashed on landing. He skidded one way, then across, zig-zagging down the flight deck. We were all ready to leap up and unload the guns and we didn’t know which way to run.’
The cockpit was watertight up to the coaming and was enclosed by a long, framed glazing with a steep windscreen for good visibility in bad weather. The glass was totally un-armoured initially, although some attempts to improve protection were made after the Norwegian campaign. Armoured glass was added to the front panel of the windshield and metal panels were installed across the lower part of the outer windshield panels.
Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:29 pm
exactly my point, about as streamlined as as cinderblockbdk wrote:I've always ben curious of the reason the windscreen was designed as it was. Anyone know?
Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:00 pm
Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:30 pm
[/quote]
Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:12 pm
tom d. friedman wrote:great vision for attack yes.... but the drag from that windshield wall must have been horrible as to speed performance!!!
Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:09 pm