Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Aug 11, 2025 3:57 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tupolev 95 Bear question
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:38 pm
Posts: 2
Recently I interviewed a USAF Vietnam veteran who flew F-4C escorts over North Vietnam as GIB. On one mission an EC-121 requested his aircraft investigate and unidentified radar return high above him. The pilot applied afterburner and climbed to 50,000 feet and both crew identified a Tupolev 95 Bear bomber estimated at 65,000 feet heading north. Rules of engagement required attacking only North Vietnam Air Force aircraft, so they reported their observation and descended.

According to internet sources the Tu-95 ceiling was 36,000 m while another claims 45,000 feet. Was the F-4C GIB incorrect in his assessment of the TU-95 altitude? It seems very high for a turboprop aircraft to fly. I know USAF SAC RB-36 flew at 50,000 feet during missions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
mossieguy wrote:
Recently I interviewed a USAF Vietnam veteran who flew F-4C escorts over North Vietnam as GIB. On one mission an EC-121 requested his aircraft investigate and unidentified radar return high above him. The pilot applied afterburner and climbed to 50,000 feet and both crew identified a Tupolev 95 Bear bomber estimated at 65,000 feet heading north. Rules of engagement required attacking only North Vietnam Air Force aircraft, so they reported their observation and descended.

According to internet sources the Tu-95 ceiling was 36,000 m while another claims 45,000 feet. Was the F-4C GIB incorrect in his assessment of the TU-95 altitude? It seems very high for a turboprop aircraft to fly. I know USAF SAC RB-36 flew at 50,000 feet during missions.


65,000' does seem high for a Tu-95. Think about it this way. The early U-2's had an operational ceiling just slightly higher than that until they burned off a lot of gas. Powers was supposedly under 70,000 ft when he was shot down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:48 pm
Posts: 146
Location: 6.0 NM NW of KNFE
mossieguy wrote:
Recently I interviewed a USAF Vietnam veteran who flew F-4C escorts over North Vietnam as GIB. On one mission an EC-121 requested his aircraft investigate and unidentified radar return high above him. The pilot applied afterburner and climbed to 50,000 feet and both crew identified a Tupolev 95 Bear bomber estimated at 65,000 feet heading north. Rules of engagement required attacking only North Vietnam Air Force aircraft, so they reported their observation and descended.

According to internet sources the Tu-95 ceiling was 36,000 m while another claims 45,000 feet. Was the F-4C GIB incorrect in his assessment of the TU-95 altitude? It seems very high for a turboprop aircraft to fly. I know USAF SAC RB-36 flew at 50,000 feet during missions.


For what it's worth, I went back to my "archives" of Jane's All The World's Aircraft books from the 1980s and it lists the Tu-95 service ceiling as 39,370 feet.

Hope that helps!

Anthony

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Actually, more current data than the Jane's books shows the service ceiling as 45,000 feet. I don't think even the stripped-down Tu-95RT's could make another 20,000 feet though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:38 pm
Posts: 2
Thank you gentlemen. You knowledge and assistance is greatly appreciated. Now to locate the Aircraft Commander of that F-4C for his recollectons of this event.
Mossieguy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group