Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 2:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:37 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
nasa / the u.s. govt will give your favorite museum a free retired space shuttle with a few main hitches........ your museum pays the shipping & handling price tag of 28.8 million dollars per shuttle, including post flight repairs, delivery on the 747 jumbo jet hauler w/ capability for it's landing & delivery at location. the shuttle must be displayed indoors w/ climate control which means most museums would have to construct a new building. many museums are scrambling to snag 1 per the guidelines. this has been the biggest scramble since the retirement of the concords. that was easier because the airlines could choose where they went. best bests are udvar hazy / uss intrepid museums. nasa has received inquiries from 21 institutions to date. the usaf museum is in the running too, as the that branch of the military used atlantis primarily for many top secret missions. fund raising drives abound amongst the 21 potential display locations. then there is the debate of displaying it on it's landing gear, or upright in launch position w/ boosters, & yes.... even suspending it from a building structure's ceiling :shock: :lol:

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:07 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Of course the NMUSAF has asked the NASA Administrator to waive all of the stated fees.

I've seen the letter from the General to the Administrator. It was sent after the USAF turned down NASA's request for two T-38Cs for Dryden. Wonder how that's gonna work out ?

I also heard a couple of weeks ago that they were going to delay the museum option and keep the Shuttles in flyable storage just in case they're needed.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:49 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Rick, if the request for the T-38's came after the museum was told that just because they are the NMUSAF doesn't mean they will automatically get a shuttle and that there is a chance the shuttle we want may go to Chicago(just yards away from where a corrupt government murdered an airport), then turning down that request could be a very smart move in a chess game.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
rick, that is good news. i've always believed that at least 1 shuttle should be in ready reserve in case of an emergency with the space station. i know that doesn't mean instant launch in such a scenario, but it would be more prudent to shave the time off launch time.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
I wouldn't be so quick to "write-off" the Space Shuttles. My best friend who lives in Florida knows many people down in NASA. There is a lot going on "behind the scenes" with politics as usual. NASA is just as sneaky as the Federal government in doing things to accomplish their stated goals and mission. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Space Shuttle ends up flying another 5 years or so. I think after November, the whole argument about which museums get the Space Shuttles will be a moot point.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group