Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Aug 24, 2025 9:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
For now, anyways. I assume the shuttle to fly the additional mission will be Atlantis, as she'll be the "ready" shuttle for what was projected to be the last one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... sec-nation

Panel approves compromise plan to save space jobs and add shuttle mission

Quote:
But the three-year NASA spending plan passed by the committee adds a $1 billion shuttle mission to the international space station for next summer or fall and leaves contracts, equipment and personnel in place in case other flights are needed.


Still has to pass the House, but the Admin is supporting it and TPTB want the potential cuts in NASA personnel off the table in places like Florida before voters show up at the polls in November. Might end up being a situation similar to that with the USS John F. Kennedy during the last years of her active service: shuttles and their infrastructure will be kept ready, but no more actual flights beyond the additional 2011 one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 331
It will be interesting to see, but I am not holding my breath, if Obama stands by what he says and vetos, or otherwise quashes this. I hope not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:59 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
it is foolhardy to retire the entire fleet. moth ball 1 & keep 1 in strategic reserve on a contingency basis. yes, i know..... it's not cost affective, but down the road 1 may be needed for an emergency mission where time is of the essence. otherwise what are we going to do in an emergency?? paypal 20 million bucks to the russians for an american astronaut to sit his buttskie on a soyuz for the mission?? + nasa's replacement vehicle is years away from deployment as testing has just begun.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group