Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:05 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Durham, NC, U.S.
I kniow this a/c was supposed to be restored as closely as possible to factory specification...did that include the R-2800? Was a Corsair relevant P&W installed in that airframe? I know a lot of Corsairs fly with later engines...was just curious abou this one. Thanks

_________________
I'm looking for that buried Corsair(s) that I can dig up, pressure wash, and fly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 1672
I think it's an early one. It has a 3-bladed prop, after all. I don't fly it (I fly some of the others there), but I don't recall any ADI (water-methanol) around the hangar.

Mike Hennigar posts here occasionally. He's a photographer. Perhaps you could ask him to take a close-up of the engine data-plate. I won't be there until Nov 6.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:09 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Dave Hadfield wrote:
I think it's an early one. It has a 3-bladed prop, after all. I don't fly it (I fly some of the others there), but I don't recall any ADI (water-methanol) around the hangar.

Mike Hennigar posts here occasionally. He's a photographer. Perhaps you could ask him to take a close-up of the engine data-plate. I won't be there until Nov 6.

Dave

Some have -79 (A-26) with downdraft carb and small accessory section.
At least 1 has a CB16 or later version of R-2800 installed with original Prop.
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:45 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2378
Location: Minnesota
This is a quote from an article by Warbirds International-January/February 2004, on the aircraft, shortly after its restoration was completed:

"Ray Anderson built up the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 radial, creating an engine just as it was when installed in the Corsair at the Goodyear Factory. Ray also spent considerable time determining the exact paint specifications used on the engine."

There isn't any other mention about the engine within the article other than this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
I'm pretty sure it's a R-2800-8W, which would be correct for this particular corsair variant.

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:05 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Durham, NC, U.S.
Thanks for the replies. Is there a large difference in power ouput between the -2800 variants? I had heard that the later engines were easier to maintain or easier to start?...something like that, can't remember exactly. It's awesome that the restorers went to that level of authenticity with the FG-1D. I like the scheme now, but man that plane was beautiful when it was in the factory-fresh markings...

_________________
I'm looking for that buried Corsair(s) that I can dig up, pressure wash, and fly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
FutureCorsairOwner wrote:
Thanks for the replies. Is there a large difference in power ouput between the -2800 variants? I had heard that the later engines were easier to maintain or easier to start?...something like that, can't remember exactly. It's awesome that the restorers went to that level of authenticity with the FG-1D. I like the scheme now, but man that plane was beautiful when it was in the factory-fresh markings...


VWoC haven't changed the markings at all, except to put on few taped-on additional symbols (to change the American Star to a PTO FAA insignia, and add an X to the tail). It's still as beautiful as when it rolled off John Lane's assembly line...

I don't think that the later variants were better than the -8's actually. More power perhaps, but I know the -18 and -32 variants (as used on -4 and -5 corsairs) were real pigs at times.

Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group