Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 4:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: WWII British bomb idea
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
I apologize in advance for not being very knowledgeable on British bomber designs, but I have been scratching my head trying to ID this one to see if it could deliver the ordnance in the story.

Poison dart bomb

Image

It was a fun read, but even less practical than the Batbomb.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:16 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2636
Armstrong Whitworth, A.W. 38 Whitley.

Regards,
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
Thanks, I had looked at that one, but the reference pictures I had were for inline engines.

I guess this means that UK reporters aren't any better than their US counterparts when it comes to research.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Thanks for the pointer to the article, Cozmo!

It reads as a a normal result of the release of secret documents, under the 'XX' year rule. There's usually a few 'gee whizz' bits in there. However the facts, as known match up once you strip the hyperbole.

Britain, like most countries experimented with chemical and biological warfare in the 1930s (those 'smoke laying devices weren't all for smoke) but didn't pursue it. In W.W.II all the major combatants stockpiled various chemical and biological weapons and there's a few traces of anticipated uses - defensive or offensive if you look hard.

A famous example of wartime tests was Gruinard Island: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruinard_Island

I like the bit about 'abandoning' the idea in 1945. Well, yes, they were very definitely winning with the other weapons!

In W.W.I 'flechettes' were small weighted darts like sharp finned bullets, mostly, and thrown out of aircraft as they crossed the front line or a convoy. Given the horse drawn nature of the armies of 1914-18, they had a bigger target than just men (with helmets).

The AW Whitley, seen in the pre-war pic with Tiger engines, rather than the more common, later Merlins, was one of Britain's heavies in 1939, along with the Wellington. It was used extensively by Bomber Command initially for 'Bumpf Raids' - dropping propaganda leaflets and they flew as far as Berlin to do so. Obsolete, it was used later in Coastal Command against U Boats and was the main type used to develop the paratroop drooping technique through the ventral hole where the ventral turret had originally been fitted.

Leonard Cheshire started W.W.II as a Whitley pilot in 1940 and was an observer in a B-29 at the dropping of one of the atomic bombs - five years of the bomber war.

Group Captain Geoffrey Leonard Cheshire, Baron Cheshire, VC, OM, DSO and Two Bars, DFC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Cheshire

He would probably point to his postwar work as his greater achievement.

Just some thoughts.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:02 pm
Posts: 566
Location: Brisbane Qld Australia
today's newspaper here talks about Britain proposing to chemical bomb Tokyo in 1944.

_________________
..defeat is never an option!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group