RyanShort1 wrote:
wapeach wrote:
OKay so he's a "nice republican"....gotcha

And I am NOT a Republican... Haven't voted for a Republican candidate for president in 4 elections... seriously! And I agree with you about bringing the troops home. If we are going to avoid a "great depression" it will take fiscal responsibility everywhere. Just bringing the troops home will not be enough, because people will still insist that we pay their military paychecks (which I do not begrudge them)... which still means taking tax dollars from you and me. The savings will be in fuel and equipment costs, that's probably about it.
Ryan
Ryan, I agree that tax dollars must be saved, however taking from the most vulnerable is not the solution. Look at all the money that went to the corporate bailouts. The economy is still in the toilet. How about taking that money and making it easy for people to start up a business? There is enough money around to make "welfare" unecessary if it were used with due diligence. When Bush took the speculation controls off of oil, that's when the price went nuts. AA filed for bankruptcy, I'm am willing to bet fuel prices were a factor. The Gulf war, is it because Saddam Hussain was so corrupt? Hell no, it was because of OIL. There were no weapons of mass destruction.
You are correct that fiscal responsibility is badly needed. However, that being said, not ALL foreclosures are because people bought more than they could afford. A lot of them are collateral damage as a result of that (job loss, portfolio losses, etc). Certainly having people living in tent cities a la Grapes of Wrath isn't going to fix anything.
I promise I won't sent the 99% to occupy your front lawn.
