Iclo wrote:
When an European company decides to buy Boeing airplanes, in place of Airbus there is never so much patriotic reaction. The peoples said : "This time, Boeing was better than us, we must improve our product, etc".
One company can't achieve to win all the bids, on all the market.
Sir, I honestly hope you don't believe that.
What about the airlines both within and outside of Europe that were forced to purchase Airbus products in order to gain landing slots within Europe?
I'm sorry, but no airline has been forced to buy Boeing to operate into, from, or within the United States. Nor has any airline been penalized for operating Airbus within the United States. However, in Europe, both have happened for Boeing and McDonnell Douglas operators. Then again, no US airline is owned by the government and thus have a conflict of interest in purchase of aircraft because its government not only has a financial interest in an airline but also in a company that manufactures aircraft for those airlines...
BTW, on the subject of how much of an Airbus is built in the US, consider the fact that the vast majority of the suppliers that Airbus uses in the US also supply parts for Boeing. The majority of the major structures (wings, fuselage, landing gear, horizonta/vertical stabilizers, etc.) are manufactured and assembled in Europe. The only major structure of the A330 not built in Europe are some of the fuselage sections which are built in Korea. On the Boeing 767, the wings, fuselage, landing gear, horizontal, and vertical stabilizers are built in the US. The only parts built in Japan are the fuselage panels, aerodynamic fairings, landing-gear doors and inspar ribs (about 15% of the total structure of the aircraft).
Whatever happened to the law that said that aircraft purchased by the military had to be 75% manufactured and assembled in the US? Because as of right now, the last 2 contracts awarded by the US Military were to products built 75% outside of the US.