Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 6:45 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: HMS Ark Royal retired
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:20 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The extremly tight British budget issues have forced the HMS Ark Royal (fifth ship to carry the name over the Centuries) to be decommisioned as a money saving exercise.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
That's not the only thing going away. Also all of the Harriers as well as the R1 Sentinal system, the Nimrod MRA4s, and the Nimrod R1s (this one being replaced by an Anglicized RC-135 Rivet Joint).

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:26 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
And aren't the Chinese refitting the HMS Invincible bought as a gutted hulk into a 'trainer' carrier?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:29 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
The Inspector wrote:
And aren't the Chinese refitting the HMS Invincible bought as a gutted hulk into a 'trainer' carrier?

Britain, Russia, what's the difference? :lol:

You're correct with the Russian Varyag, although there may have been a desire to do the same with Invincible, the Chinese businessman's purchase hasn't gone through.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Chi ... ft_carrier

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Invincible_%28R05%29

The irony of the defence cutbacks in the UK is the literally MAD desire to hang onto their 'nuclear deterrent' non-tactical nukes (that there's no conceivable case for using) and losing many of the tactical and strategic tools Old SAR pilot's listed. Can't face losing the big-boy's club membership, so selling the cutlery used to eat with. :roll:

My opinion only, of course.

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
So it's the boxing philosophy, if the smaller guy can get inside the taller guys effective range (his full stroke punch) then the smaller guy has the advantage with the opponents body exposed and poorly defended. The Scottish Sword, Dirk, Dagger idea that no matter how near or far, I can still do you serious injury.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:00 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Ah, well that clears it up... :rolleyes: Which - boxing or Glasgae knife fights? Trust me; The Marquis of Queensberry would've lasted 3 seconds in the back streets of Scotland's fine cities.

The Scottish view is a lot to do with always fighting; with yersel' if no scunner else pla. Not a good plan with nukes.

Just another reason why nuclear deterrence and MAD has nothing to do with any other theories of warfare. But I'm sure your suggestion is the level that the British Government is operating on. :wink:

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
The next time that Argentina gets upity about the Falklands."Islas Malvinas" The UK contingency plan is to place a plywood deck onto an oil tanker and fly piper cubs armed with sidewinders.downsizing really sucks

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
They'll have to contract it out-Maybe they can get Bruce and Sly, and Der Guvinator to 'do a deal' using Segal and Van Dame as pawns................

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:06 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Dundas, ON
I was under the impression the Varyag was sold by the Ukraine to a businessman from Hong Kong who wanted to turn it into a floating Casino in Macau. Now a Chinese businessman wants to turn Invincible into a floating school? If there's a pattern we'd probably find Invincible being adopted by the PLAN.


Last edited by goshikisen on Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 12:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
No, as in USS Wolverine or USS Sable, a pilot training aircraft carrier

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:32 pm
Posts: 117
The chinese have been working to develope a carrier as part of their plan to achieve a "parity" with the US.
If you look up chinese aircraft carrier on wiki....I know, not the most correct/reliable info....
you will find that they've been buying pretty much anything they could get since the mid eighties when they bought the Australian carrier Melbourne. They do it thru various schemes- ie: business man buys it for a "casino".....That business man just happens to have ties to their military of course.
Looks to me as though they've determined what direction to go in- US style or Russian style and are building one or more of their own, but from the info out there, no civilian people know how close they are to completion.....I would hope/assume the US military knows exactly where they are at.
The really scary questions are: what do they plan to do with those ships? and Do we really think they are our friends?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:55 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Yuma, AZ/Las Cruces, NM
HMS Invincible was just sold to Turkish breakers:
http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defenc ... _1_2393126

BB-61


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group