Bill and Rich,
With all due respect, I think that the forum's rules against making fairly incendiary personal comments probably would rule against calling folks "cockroaches." As a regular traveller, I have encountered a lot of TSA agents that are really good folks just trying to do a job that the government has asked them to do. Are there some bad eggs? Absolutely. Do they give everyone else a bad name? You bet. In the same way that the Tailhook scandal was not representative of all naval aviators, bad TSA agents are in no way representative of all TSA agents.
My father in law spent 30 years working for the Fire Department, rescuing folks from burning buildings and ugly car accidents, providing comfort to families at the scene of fatal accidents, and working hard to make our community a better, safer place. After his retirement, he was offered a job with the TSA. He works long, weird hours (6 days in a row on, 2 off) with no regular weekends. He works hard, always has a smile on his face, and often talks about trying to think about how inconvenient his job makes others, and how hard he tries to make that inconvenience at least a little less miserable. He's a good, honest, friendly guy who happens to work for the TSA. A cockroach? I don't think so, and I think it does him and his coworkers a disservice for anyone to so grossly characterize them as such. He's the first to talk about some of the difficulties of the job, but works hard to make them at least tolerable.
Do I think the TSA was a bad idea, and that it hugely imposes on us, the regular, responsible travellers who only want to go from point A to point B? Absolutely. Do I think that the new administration should take a hard look at it? You betcha. Would that put my father-in-law out of a job? Maybe, but he'd be fine. Does a bad government policy make all of the agency's employees cockroaches? Nope.
Off the soapbox.
Respectfully,
kevin
_________________ FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!
|