| Warbird Information Exchange https://www.warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/ |
|
| gear up landing https://www.warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=17643 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | skybolt2003 [ Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | gear up landing |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4QHpVXtxI This is in the "I couldn't hear the tower warning me that my gear was up because of that darned horn in my ear . . ." category. They seem to be doing an awful lot of yacking base to final – not a sterile environment. Apparently, this guy was on a commercial check ride in this video. I wish it didn't end so soon I'm dying to know what they said afterward! Not as good as the P-51 landing video with the crazy woman, but still. |
|
| Author: | O.P. [ Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hi Skybolt! I wonder why the camera dude didn't say anything when he looked down and saw nothing? Ohhh well... Here is my new favorite GA airplane video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCOqA01NSN8 Heheeeee, I know it's mean, and I know that dude is stupid for doing that, but, I love that one 
Maybe we can start a new thread called "Stupid 172 Tricks" |
|
| Author: | skybolt2003 [ Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
O.P. wrote: Hi Skybolt!
I wonder why the camera dude didn't say anything when he looked down and saw nothing? Ohhh well... Here is my new favorite GA airplane video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCOqA01NSN8 Heheeeee, I know it's mean, and I know that dude is stupid for doing that, but, I love that one Maybe we can start a new thread called "Stupid 172 Tricks" Okay, that truly was stupid. You all heard about the guy who recently tried to roll his Baron and killed himself and his passengers. I think this guy is lucky |
|
| Author: | Planebeach [ Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Rolling a Baron is no problem, if your Bob Hoover. But for the rest of us its just stupid to even atempt. I was suprised that the first flim clip with gear up landing, that the pilots did not svear. |
|
| Author: | tom d. friedman [ Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
a day late & a dollar short |
|
| Author: | Bill Greenwood [ Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Gear up |
I feel sorry for those guys, but at least no injuries. When I turn in, I try to first focus on the gear final check. One reason I prefer non tower airports is so you don't have someone yammering in your headset while flying. I also try to brief my passenger to be a back up check for me that the gear is down, in case I forget. One very proper English lady said to me in all seriousness, "Young man, do you forget it often?" |
|
| Author: | bdk [ Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Planebeach wrote: Rolling a Baron is no problem, if your Bob Hoover. But for the rest of us its just stupid to even atempt. What is the big deal about rolling a Baron?O.P. wrote: Here is my new favorite GA airplane video, I'm sure the young lady will be endeared to aviation for the rest of her life... She will be the one afraid to have the airport near her house because all general aviation pilots are reckless!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCOqA01NSN8 Heheeeee, I know it's mean, and I know that dude is stupid for doing that, but, I love that one Maybe we can start a new thread called "Stupid 172 Tricks" |
|
| Author: | skybolt2003 [ Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bdk wrote: What is the big deal about rolling a Baron?
No big deal I suppose, except it isn't an aerobatic category aircraft and if you don't have the training and ability to do it you wind up like this guy and his 4 dead friends . . . Trying to perform aerobatics without training, in a non-aerobatic aircraft is dumb. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_i ... 0463&key=1 NTSB Identification: ATL07FA077. The docket is stored in the Docket Management System (DMS). Please contact Records Management Division 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Sunday, April 22, 2007 in Hamilton, GA Probable Cause Approval Date: 8/30/2007 Aircraft: Beech 58, registration: N5647C Injuries: 5 Fatal. The accident pilot had recently returned from an airshow, and had shared with his pilot associates that he thought he could roll his personal airplane. He had previously attempted to roll the airplane, but a pilot-rated passenger stopped the accident pilot from completing the aerobatic roll. On the accident flight, a ground witness, who is also a pilot, heard the accident airplane, and thought it sounded like the pilot was doing aerobatic maneuvers. He heard the engine noise continue to increase, and saw the airplane descending very fast, in a 45 to 60 degree nose down attitude. The witness then saw a portion of the airplane break away prior to impact. Postaccident inspection of the airplane by the NTSB investigator-in-charge and the NTSB Materials Laboratory, disclosed evidence of pilot-induced overload failures of the tail and wings. The accident pilot's airplane was not designed or approved for aerobatic flight. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: The pilot's exceeding the design stress limits of the airplane while performing aerobatics in a nonaerobatic airplane, which resulted in an in-flight overload failure of the airframe. A factor in the accident was the pilot's decision to perform aerobatics. |
|
| Author: | muddyboots [ Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
here's your problem. Quote: Gulf Shores, Alabama
some redneck idiot with too much money and not enough brain killed three friends (I assume a couple of girlfriends and a buddy) because he couldn't get the idea of rolling airplanes out of his head. His parents (and those of the folks he murdered) would have been better served by bashing his brains out on a tree trunk the day he was born. 
|
|
| Author: | bdk [ Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skybolt2003 wrote: bdk wrote: What is the big deal about rolling a Baron? No big deal I suppose, except it isn't an aerobatic category aircraft and if you don't have the training and ability to do it you wind up like this guy and his 4 dead friends . . . Trying to perform aerobatics without training, in a non-aerobatic aircraft is dumb. |
|
| Author: | Kyleb [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bdk wrote: I won't fly with just anyone anymore. I guess as a passenger I can exercise my judgement as well.
Me too. Although sometimes it is awfully hard to come up with a reason that won't offend someone. Airport acquaintance: "Hey, wanna go for a ride with me in my Whizzbang 2000?" Me (Remembering who works on the airplane and what I happened to notice the last time I saw it with panels off.): "Uh, can't. Looks like I'm gonna have to spend all day sanding and painting that set of chocks over there." And the true answer: I will not fly in that poorly maintained machine. Not until it goes through about 3 annuals with a GOOD IA, as opposed to that blind fella you've been using. |
|
| Author: | tom d. friedman [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
that's nothing...... my best friend was the #1 faa air traffic controller at cleveland for many years up to his retirement in 2002. he was slated to retire 2 weeks after the 9/11 attack, they revoked his retirement & he had to stay another year. he plotted the airspace for cleveland sports events, the cleveland air show, etc, when any president came to cleveland he worked on the airspace with the secret service / military. anyway..... a few years back he had to go to chicago for an faa award. i asked him why he was driving the 6 hours instead of a 1 hour flight, & he said i know 1st hand what goes on in the air & in the tower, i'm driving unless i'm at the controls of the plane. my buddy also relates that many currently new air traffic controllers don't even have their pilot's license. |
|
| Author: | bdk [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
tom d. friedman wrote: my buddy also relates that many currently new air traffic controllers don't even have their pilot's license. When was that ever a requirement? Do you expect that? I think that very few controllers do. I've known a number of them over the years at Chino (which is a training tower) and I can't remember one.
|
|
| Author: | tom d. friedman [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
honestly..... i would expect that, i wouldn't want anybody to have lives in their hands without proper credentials. a typical drivers education teacher at least has that. |
|
| Author: | CAPFlyer [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
While they don't actually have a ticket, they have to complete a written equivalent of the Commercial exam, so they are knowledgeable about most of the same things that we have to know in the cockpit. BTW, the comparison of a Driver's Ed teacher and ATC is Apples and Oranges. In Aviation, the Driver's Ed teacher is your instructor.  The proper comparison would be that ATC is like the traffic engineer or traffic manager at the local or state transportation office. While they may have a driver's license, they're not required to for the job, they only have to know the relevant rules and specifications that pertain to their part of the puzzle.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|