Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 2:40 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 2:27 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5743
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
http://chicagobreakingbusiness.com/2011 ... cheme.html

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:24 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Genius!

I am surprised they are still flying those dinosaurs!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5592
Location: Eastern Washington
When I read the title of the post, I thought you meant the first United 747...not simpley the first one in their new merged color scheme.

The real first United 747 is probably long-gone by now...first into a Toyota, then a Honda...now a Chinese tea kettle. :) .


the330thbg wrote:
I am surprised they are still flying those dinosaurs!


I'm flying SEA to LHR in a 400 in a BA example in couple of weeks.
They seem in fine shape...and you do realize the -400s are a bit newer than 1969? :wink:

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:16 pm
Posts: 38
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Boeing continues to update and build 747's. The first production model of the newest version, the 747-8 Intercontinental, is expected to be delivered this year - 2011. This newest model was unveiled February 13th of this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:17 am
Posts: 76
Location: Ontario, Canada
Hey!

I fly those "dinosaurs"
and compared to the classic I used to fly, they seem pretty modern to me! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
JohnB wrote:
The real first United 747 is probably long-gone by now...first into a Toyota, then a Honda...now a Chinese tea kettle. :) .
Was still flying with Kalitta (N716CK) in December 2008 ! Now noted as 'stored' somewhere (YIP,MZJ ?).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 3:37 pm 
Offline
a.k.a. TBDude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:54 pm
Posts: 624
Location: Southern California
The first 747 built was used exclusively for test flights and now resides at Seattle's Museum of Flight.

The first 747 to carry passngers flew with Pan Am and ended its days as a failed tourist attraction/restaurant in South Korea. It was finally broken up for scrap just a few months ago (Dec 2010)...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2013665589_plane13.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:20 pm 
lotus49 wrote:
Hey!

I fly those "dinosaurs"
and compared to the classic I used to fly, they seem pretty modern to me! :D


I would agree that the 747-400 is not a "Vintage" aircraft yet. When the day comes that they are no longer being used for scheduled air line service, we can put them in the vintage category. I think it's kind of analogous to the C-130 on the "Warbird" side. You can probably put the C-130A's and C-130B's built back in the fifties and early sixties in the warbird category, but certainly the more recent and currently serving C-130H and C-130J models are not yet "warbirds."

As to the new United/Continental livery, I can't say I like it very much.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 7:04 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
But it does show just how circular things are in aviation. In the late 60's both Continental and DELTA ordered, took delivery of early model -100's, and decided the market wasn't there to support the Queen so they unloaded them, now that they've bought out UNITED and NORTHWEST they are back in the whale business by inheritance (or is it shotgun marriage?). In fact, if you have a pound can of safety wire, it probably has a picture of a DELTA 747 on it all flared out for landing. I pity the guys who do fleet inventory for NW/DELTA, what do they have? about 26 different makes and models of airframes from 3 different manufacturers?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
jwc50 wrote:
lotus49 wrote:
Hey!

I fly those "dinosaurs"
and compared to the classic I used to fly, they seem pretty modern to me! :D


I would agree that the 747-400 is not a "Vintage" aircraft yet. When the day comes that they are no longer being used for scheduled air line service, we can put them in the vintage category. I think it's kind of analogous to the C-130 on the "Warbird" side. You can probably put the C-130A's and C-130B's built back in the fifties and early sixties in the warbird category, but certainly the more recent and currently serving C-130H and C-130J models are not yet "warbirds."

As to the new United/Continental livery, I can't say I like it very much.


I'm not sure that I'll ever be able to accept an airplane with a "glass cockpit" as vintage, let alone an airplane that was first flown and delivered after my career started (true for the -400, anyhow.) :? :roll:

I don't really care for the new paint, either. I wish that at least they had kept the "tulup."

_________________
Steve
www.eaglesmereairmuseum.org
www.net2nite.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:01 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
By fuel standards these days is what i was referring to when I used the term 'dinosaur'.

How have they improve 'fuel effieciency' over the years.., besides, winglets and new engines.., are they making composite parts as well?

Thanks!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
the330thbg wrote:
By fuel standards these days is what i was referring to when I used the term 'dinosaur'.

How have they improve 'fuel effieciency' over the years.., besides, winglets and new engines.., are they making composite parts as well?

Thanks!



I think about 50% of the 787 structure is composite.

_________________
Steve
www.eaglesmereairmuseum.org
www.net2nite.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:40 pm
Posts: 293
Location: Illinois
Airplanejunkie wrote:
the330thbg wrote:
By fuel standards these days is what i was referring to when I used the term 'dinosaur'.

How have they improve 'fuel effieciency' over the years.., besides, winglets and new engines.., are they making composite parts as well?

Thanks!



I think about 50% of the 787 structure is composite.


The 50% is by weight. The 777 uses only 12% composites.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 14
The paint is a good merger compromise...... CAL colors and UAL name. (Although I would have preferred the opposite) :) Personally, I think it's the best looking paint job on a legacy carrier..... CAL flew the 747 in these colors before they were phased out. I don't imagine that UAL will keep the plane for long, which is a shame.

_________________
Jim
www.flapsdown.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:06 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
UAL is much more of a recognized global brand, hence keeping the name. Conti phased out their gas hungry 47's decades ago. They are anxiously awaiting the 787's and her variants!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group