Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:17 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 12:32 pm
Posts: 198
Originally posted by Mark Allen. Original comments will be merged with this thread.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Peleliu
The photos below are likely VMF-114 Corsairs, September 1944.

Also these two videos below are very nice additions to the thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUD8aQL7QvI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqFAoHouE4Y

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
WIX_Archive posts sponsored by:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 11:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Cheshire, CT
Great shots Mark! Thanks for posting!
Notice the dive brakes deployed on the Corsair in the second photo.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Perth Western Australia
The relationship between the tanks and the planes that dropped them surprises me. The tanks are fully rotated and almost underneath the presumably relatively slow moving planes.
Am I reading the angles wrong or is there another explanation?

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:36 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5731
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Looks like Dante's Inferno. I wonder what it looks like today? Thanks for the pics Mark

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:37 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
Rick65 wrote:
The relationship between the tanks and the planes that dropped them surprises me. The tanks are fully rotated and almost underneath the presumably relatively slow moving planes.
Am I reading the angles wrong or is there another explanation?


I don’t believe there were any fins on them as they had no need to aerodynamically land nose first. They simply burst open upon impact.

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:47 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7540
A great photo resource below.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/122923075@N06/page1

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:55 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7540
Craig59 wrote:
Rick65 wrote:
The relationship between the tanks and the planes that dropped them surprises me. The tanks are fully rotated and almost underneath the presumably relatively slow moving planes.
Am I reading the angles wrong or is there another explanation?


I don’t believe there were any fins on them as they had no need to aerodynamically land nose first. They simply burst open upon impact.

That is correct.

Image

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
Craig59 wrote:
Rick65 wrote:
The relationship between the tanks and the planes that dropped them surprises me. The tanks are fully rotated and almost underneath the presumably relatively slow moving planes.
Am I reading the angles wrong or is there another explanation?


I don’t believe there were any fins on them as they had no need to aerodynamically land nose first. They simply burst open upon impact.


If you watch napalm videos, the tanks separate and then act unpredictably. Sure, they fall, but with a tumbling motion that makes them behave like knuckleballs. I'm surprised fins were never added to make their behavior more predictable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:46 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
I seem to recall that the tumbling of napalm tanks was actually desired. The tumbling caused greater dispersion/splattering of the gel. Some later versions had fins, but most did not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:27 pm
Posts: 2550
Another aspect is the drop altitude with finned napalm tanks. The A-26A crews at NKP preferred the finned variety over the HCM Trail in Laos. Unfinned required them to get down to about 300 ft for any hope of hitting a target. Fins gave directionality and allowed a dive angle to a higher altitude for the drop. This is better for working in the dark around mountains and jungle. Considering all the BB’s that could you hole your airplane at 300 ft, anything would be good that allowed a safer height. Different war, different conditions usually bring desirable improvements.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 313
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Thought they were just standard long range drop tanks repurposed for Napalm.

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:44 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
Spitty wrote:
Thought they were just standard long range drop tanks repurposed for Napalm.


They were, but with all of the other specialized gear we sent to war, it is interesting that they chose that application to use an off-the shelf adaptation.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Craig59, Google [Bot], hurricane_yank, Scott Keller and 99 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group