Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:10 am
mrhenniger wrote:O.P. wrote:The 800 came out really grainy.
I saw your pics. You are right, the 800 was grainy. However I have to wonder if we are using the same film. Mine never came out that bad. Nice shooting though. It looks like you have a steady hand!
Mike
Thanks! It was Kodak 800. All of the 400 came out good, even inside the hangars. The image through the viewfinder seemed dark, but the pictures inside there came out great. I have to go back and retake all of the inside pictures at livermoore with the new camera.
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:20 am
O.P. wrote:It was Kodak 800.
Aaaahhhh... I have used the Fuji 800 with success. I used the Kodak high speeds a number of years ago and didn't like the results, it looks like they have not really improved. I have been satisfied with the Fuji, although it is not as nice as the 400 for the final results, but then sometimes you just need the higher speed.
Mike
Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:14 pm
Mike, The grain aslo depends on how well it was processed.
Eric
Eric
Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:18 pm
Can't we make beer with grain, eh?
Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:59 am
AIRIC wrote:The grain aslo depends on how well it was processed.
Well you learn something every day!
Mike
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:15 am
Yes, If the chemistry was to warm or over concentrated it wll increase the look of the grain and density of the negative. Processing chemistry is a very fine art. Ollie, I don't think you want to drink beer made of this kind of grain
Eric
Eric
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:05 am
Bah, it costs nothing to ask!!