Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:13 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:45 am 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Well, I've been selling everything of value in my house, other than Digital camera gear and firearms, to invest in some nicer camera gear. I've been lusting after this for sometime and I had enough saved to order it while B&H was having a sale on it.
So here it is. Now I can hang out with the cool kids at that airshows!
Image
Image
Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: new machine
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:30 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Tim, What's it cost to do an annual on that thing?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: new machine
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:33 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Tim, What's it cost to do an annual on that thing?


I'm sure I want to know until I have to.

The camera along seems to be about $105 a year to keep going. I had to get the shutter replace this past month, I hope it will stay around for aonther 28,000 clicks.

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: big Cannon
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:58 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Photography and the associated hardware seems to be the second most popular thing on WIX after planes. I used to do a bit, I stiil have two Leicas whch produce the most beautiful prints. I don't know much about the current stuff and computers. Paul had one at Centenial that was most bigger than he was. Is Cannon the top brand or is it all pretty equal?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big Cannon
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:55 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Is Cannon the top brand or is it all pretty equal?


I think the Canon vs Nikon is like the Ford vs Chevy debate. 8)

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:27 am
Posts: 257
Location: Schiedam, NL
Awesome :D
That will be on my wish list forever because I'm not going to spend that much money on a lens. But still I'm happy with my Canon EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM :lol:

_________________
http://www.warbird-hangar.com links and gallery &
http://www.yakkes.com Yakkes Foundation, Yak-52


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big Cannon
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:27 am
Posts: 257
Location: Schiedam, NL
Bill Greenwood wrote:
Is Cannon the top brand or is it all pretty equal?

For me Canon (L series) is :prayer: but I have a Sigma EX 100-300 F4 for the telephoto zoom because Canon L is over my budget.
My camera is the Canon EOS 400D.

_________________
http://www.warbird-hangar.com links and gallery &
http://www.yakkes.com Yakkes Foundation, Yak-52


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1430
Location: North Texas
I'll wade in on the Nikon/Canon debate a bit here. I had a couple of friends that were pro field photographers. Both prefered Nikon when they were in situations and on projects where they might only get one chance for that award winning photo, or were going to be in extreme or isolated enviroments. For everyday and general all around use though, both would grab their Canon gear. The tv network that I used to work for had all Canon lenses for our video cameras and they did the job for the money and we got fairly long life out of them. The one thing going for them though, was that we had a Canon trained lens guy in the shop and he managed to rotate evey one of the lenses in for a complete teardown, inspection and adjustment at least once a quater, so he caught most of the problems before they became major ones.
Personally, I prefer my good old Nikon F3 to anything else, as it takes whatever abuse that I give it and keeps on going. Since I bought it new, the ony thing it has ever had to have done to it is have the shutter mechanism cleaned and adjusted one time. I've had the thing for thirty+years now and still don't want to give it up.

Best advice is buy the best quality that you can afford that will do everything that you want, as a minimum, and go from there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Specialized lens life
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:23 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Do you guys know about extending lens life? Every photo you take of a jet or a T-28 shortens lens life. A few snaps of something like a Fairey Gannet cna ruin one quickly. To extend life, focus on something graceful like certain Merlin fighters or maybe some of those ladies Doug has down in Dallas.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:01 am
Posts: 863
Location: FL
Tim,
Canon vs. Nikon =Ford vs. Chevy?
How about Mustang vs. Corsair!
Now there is a WIX comparison.


Bill,
one of many who favors Mustangs :wink:

_________________
Bill


Website
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 234
Location: Summerville, SC
I am sorry Bill but I have to strongly disagree with you on the matter of "lens Life". A flat, boring, in-line will cause the lens to deform into that shape, while a nice, beautiful, exciting round engine will help the camera keep its nice round shape. Just my two cents worth. :twisted:

_________________
Col Craig Duck
Life Member CAF
Life Member YAF
Life Member EAA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:57 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
wls3 wrote:
Tim,
Canon vs. Nikon =Ford vs. Chevy?
How about Mustang vs. Corsair!
Now there is a WIX comparison.


Bill,
one of many who favors Mustangs :wink:


:oops:
:oops:
:oops:
what can I say :oops:

Scott, please don't ban me for my transgressions.

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: round lens
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Craig, I must bow to your post as superior wit, sometimes we all need a good laugh and you provided one.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
you'll get a multi-tasking work out just holding up that monster...... and great pics to boot!!!! enjoy!!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:35 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Question>

Should I sell my 70-300 f4 - 5.6 now that I've upgraded to the 100-400mm lens?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/3 ... EF_IS.html
Discuss Please:

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group