Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:52 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: FIAT G-91 for US ARMY
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:25 pm
Posts: 399
Location: Atlanta
Hi Guys,

My first post here.

Can anyone help me to find out more about this G-91?

I am wondering if it's still around somewhere or it was scrapped?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CPnLU_SYUGM/T ... 1R-1+1.jpg

On another forum a person mentioned a scanned picture of a G.91T-1 MM.6289/NC.2, coded US ARMY 0002.

Any information is much appreciated!

Moreno

_________________
--
Moreno Aguiari
mo@vintageaviationnews.com
http://www.vintageaviationnews.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:39 am 
Online
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2537
Found this on another forum,

"According to Steve Harding's book: US Army Aircraft since 1947, the two Fiat G.91s that were borrowed from the Luftwaffe were as follows:

One was an Italian built G.91R-1, c/n 0052 that served with the Luftwaffe (BD+102)The other was a German built G.91R-3 (c/n 0065) Luftwaffe EC+105. From the b/w pics in the book, it looks like both a/c were in Luftwaffe camo, but there appears to be an orange or red tail as well as an orange/red section around the lower nose area. The numbers on the tail were the c/n's (0065 and 0052)."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Canada
I had read about this briefly once. Thank you for bring it up. I'm interested to see what kinds of responses you get. If I understand correctly, the G.91 was meant to be a sort of NATO standard lightweight fighter, so it isn't that far fetched that the U.S. Army was considering them.

As an aside, one of my favourite aviation memories involved watching two Portuguese G.91s having a friendly dogfight with two newly acquired (back then, anyway) Portuguese Alpha Jets. We had just pulled off some highway in the middle of nowhere in Portugal for a rest, when the four jets showed up and proceeded to entertain us with a nice little furball right over our heads. Good times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:25 pm
Posts: 399
Location: Atlanta
Thanks guys.

It would be great to know if those two G-91's are still here in the US somewhere.

--
Moreno Aguiari
Managing Editor
info@WarbirdsNews.com

_________________
--
Moreno Aguiari
mo@vintageaviationnews.com
http://www.vintageaviationnews.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:31 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
A Thousand Greetings geek ,
A good friend of mine, aka Dik Shepherd 8) , told me that the G-91s were scrapped at Fort Rucker back in the 70s :shock: . He said that he found the remains in the woods :shock: outside the base on private property back when we lived in Alabama 8) .
If I recall correctly, this would have been probably mid to late 1970s when he lived there. He was living there before I arrived in the summer of 1977 when I was going to ATC schooling :supz: . Just my two cents pop2 .

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Perth Western Australia
According to US Army Aircraft Since 1947 by Stephen Harding the G.91R-1 was lost in a fatal crash and the surviving G.91R-3 was returned to the Luftwaffe in 1962.
The planes apparently had yellow test marking over standard Luftwaffe camouflage.
I like this book because it was really cheap on a throw out bin, has lots of information on unusual and experimental VTOL and helicopters but I don't know how accurate it is.

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Great reference for 'off the wall' stuff. Had my copy for over 20 years. The biggest speed bump in the program was the Blue Suiter guys getting all puffy because 'them Armee guyz might get real jet airyplains, and that would step on our private lawn.' Didja know the Army had 2 A4D Skyhawks for a while? geek

I'll bet AMAZON could dig up a copy. it's worth the investment, U.S. Army Aircraft since 1947 by Stephen Harding, ISBN 0-933424-53-1

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:19 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1911
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
Never knew about the skyhawks. What'd they use those for?
I know at one time, there was talk of handing over A-10s to the Army for CAS aviation units organic to maneuver elements.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1161
p51 wrote:
Never knew about the skyhawks. What'd they use those for?
I know at one time, there was talk of handing over A-10s to the Army for CAS aviation units organic to maneuver elements.


P51, a pair of A-4 Skyhawks were used for US Army Evaluation, but never used in service. From this site: http://a4skyhawk.org/2c/productionhistory.htm

"In 1961, two A4D-2 Skyhawks (BuNos 148490 and 148483) were borrowed by the U.S. Army and modified by Douglas for evaluation in competition with the Northrop N-156 (predecessor of the F-5) and an Italian Fiat G-91, for operations from unimproved airfields near front lines. Modifications of the Army Skyhawk included large dual wheels on beefed-up main landing gear mounts; a heavier wing to house the larger landing gear; and installation of an A-3 Skywarrior drag chute. Flown by Douglas test pilot Dru Wood, the modified "Army" Skyhawk won the competition, but the project was canceled when Army funds were diverted to helicopter procurement."

A picture here with the beefy main gear, I say it looks quite good in that set up.
http://a4skyhawk.org/sites/a4skyhawk.or ... 148483.jpg

Seems the US Air Force has been quite vocal and successful over the years from letting the Army have any fixed wing direct combat types. As I understand it the USAF only took the A-10 with reluctance- they were more interested in the fast movers, but had to give the Army some support.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:11 am
Posts: 102
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Canada
I'm imagining landing gear mounts that are a beefed up version of those originally fitted to a carrier plane. That must have been one tough airplane.

The G.91 and A-4 look to have been photographed in front of the same hangar (not surprisingly since they were involved in the same project).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mike furline, paulmcmillan and 278 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group