Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 5:46 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:01 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Museum's fighter called back to duty
Published: July 18, 2006


A U.S. Navy F-14D "Super Tomcat" flies from the CVN-71 U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt during the aircraft's last operational cruise in January 2006 in the Persian Gulf.
John Higgins/AirTeamImages.com


By LAURENT L.N. BONCZIJK
Of The News Register


The Evergreen Aviation Museum was poised today to take the first step toward addition of a choice piece to its collection - an F-14D Super Tomcat, the fighter plane Tom Cruise flew in the hit film "Top Gun."

But the flareup of violence between the Israeli army and Hezbollah and Hamas militias in Lebanon and Gaza led to a change in plans. The Navy, which had been planning to replace the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt's F-14 Tomcats with newer, more multi-dimensional F-18 Hornets, has decided to instead dispatch the carrier to the Middle East with its current squadron of F-14s - including the one promised to the museum.

According to Colin Powers, Evergreen's director of air restoration, the museum is still in line for the plane, which will be flown into Portland, dismantled there and trucked down to McMinnville for reassembly. But not until its new unscheduled tour ends, and no one yet knows when that will be.

The Navy had originally planned to fly the plane directly into town. It would have been the largest and most powerful jet fighter ever to touch down at the McMinnville Airport.

However, officers eventually concluded that the airport lacked sufficient runway length, and that setting up the cable-hooking mechanism used for F-14 carrier landings wasn't feasible. They decided they would have to fly it into Portland instead.

The plane had been scheduled to make the cross-country flight from Virginia's Naval Air Station Oceana to Oregon's Portland International Airport today, then undergo dismantling in preparation for shipment on to McMinnville by truck - a process expected to take about two weeks.

A four-member crew from the Titan Corporation had already been dispatched from Norfolk, Va., with all of the necessary equipment. But that mission will have to be rescheduled, in light of the developments.

When the plane joins the collection, it will be on permanent loan from the National Museum of Naval Aviation. It will join the HK-1 Flying Boat seaplane, SR-71 Blackbird spy plane and Titan II missile among top museum showpieces.

Last used in the bombing of targets in Iraq in October, the plane destined for the museum runs 62 feet in length, 16 feet in height and 38 to 64 feet in width, depending on whether it has its wings fully extended or in swept-back position.

Crews will have to remove its wings, horizontal stabilizer and vertical fins for manageable truck transport and its engines, armaments and ejection seat mechanism for safe museum display. The disassembly in Portland is expected to take about two weeks and the partially reassembly for display is expected to take a like period once it reaches McMinnville.

The plane is part of fighter squadron VF-31, whose insignia features the cartoon character Felix the Cat. The squadron has long been assigned to the Roosevelt, which had been supporting U.S. military operations in Iraq prior to being called home for re-outfitting with F-18 hornets.

The F-14 was designed to provide air superiority over Soviet fighters in dogfights staged in defense of U.S. aircraft carriers. Thus, it did not transition well to other roles, such as the precision bombing called for in Iraq.

VF-31 is one of only two squadrons in the U.S. Navy still flying Tomcats. The Navy, which began taking delivery on them in the early 1970s, has been steadily swapping them out of its carrier-based squadrons in favor of the more versatile Hornets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:36 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Portage, MI
Glad to hear it...although if it was so bad at precision bombing (what a joke that is!) why would they want them back? Maybe the Navy's finally realizing that the Super Hornet isn't the be-all and end-all of Naval aviation. And maybe the author of that article should check his/her facts a little closer.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3275
Location: Las Vegas, NV
John Ceglarek wrote:
Glad to hear it...although if it was so bad at precision bombing (what a joke that is!) why would they want them back?


<Yawn>
The deployment that is the subject of this article I'm sure has zero to do with the capabilities of the Tomcat vis a vis the Super Bug. It has a lot more to do, I'm sure, with the time it will take to retrain all the crews, retrain the maintainers, restock the logistics with spares for the new jet, etc etc.

John Ceglarek wrote:
Maybe the Navy's finally realizing that the Super Hornet isn't the be-all and end-all of Naval aviation.


That I agree with, too. Putting all your eggs in one basket is a really, really, bad move...one which the USAF is about to make with the cRaptor and the Lightning II, although it's going to happen 20 years down the road for the Air Force.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: EVG
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:59 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
I case Colin Powers name is vagely familar to ya'll, his L-4 beat John Lane's ie Gary Koh's FG-1D for the Roll's Royce trophy in Reno a few years back.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: F-14 Re-Deployment
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:42 am 
Offline
Newly-minted T-6 Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:55 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Central Indiana
Hacker is right (Yes, I said it :lol:) it would take a long time just to get things going again, but I don't understand why they are bringing the cat back for this, don't they have enough Hornets already? I know the Super Hornet has came in with a bang and is very capable multi-role aircraft (watch the demo, its awesome)

I'm sure some guy at the Pentagon sees the advantage of this but who knows, besides, the Cat is back!

Quote:
John Ceglarek wrote:
Maybe the Navy's finally realizing that the Super Hornet isn't the be-all and end-all of Naval aviation.


That I agree with, too. Putting all your eggs in one basket is a really, really, bad move...one which the USAF is about to make with the cRaptor and the Lightning II, although it's going to happen 20 years down the road for the Air Force.


If you have ever read John Boyd's book, Energy Manuverability will prove the Super Hornet, cRaptor, and the Lightning II will have problems tying to jam all roles into one "fighter" There already have been a lot of issues with the F-22, it hasn't been around that long anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 401
Location: Right here and now
The adage "You want it good, fast or cheap, pick two" will always apply. Life teaches you that.

regards,

t~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:51 am 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3874
Location: DFW Texas
Quote:
Crews will have to remove its wings, horizontal stabilizer and vertical fins for manageable truck transport and its engines, armaments and ejection seat mechanism for safe museum display. The disassembly in Portland is expected to take about two weeks and the partially reassembly for display is expected to take a like period once it reaches McMinnville.


So...is this airplane going to be "demilitarized" as in chopping the wings off? or is is a "disassembly"? as in ( should I say it? ) gently enough to fly at some date in the distant future? (fat chance I know ...but it never hurts to dream)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 401
Location: Right here and now
So was VF-31/Roosevelt redeployed to the med?


Regards,

t~


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 253 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group