Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 2:45 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:23 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Pat Carry wrote:
Excellant news. I think its safe to say that more B-17's are being restored right now then at anytime over the past what, 40 years!


I hope she starts getting worked on as soon as she hits the shores. Rather than be put into long term storage like , I don't even know how many other Fortress's.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:25 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11281
Shay wrote:
I hope she starts getting worked on as soon as she hits the shores. Rather than be put into long term storage like , I don't even know how many other Fortress's.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortress
If this still belongs to Tallichet, I don't think that is his M.O. It took twenty something years to get the Marauder in the air.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:20 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:33 pm
Posts: 95
Yeah, but the B-26s weren't a priority project with Dave after the first couple of years of their return.

And besides, parts for the B-26 were/are a lot harder to come by, as oppose to parts for a B-17.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:11 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2939
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
I'm just glad it's not rotting away in that swamp - even if it goes into storage here in the states for awhile.................


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Jungle Bob

Been a couple days since the big announcment I was wondering if you could give us a SITREP on the transporting of Swamp Ghost?

Also I was wondering if the paperwork issues with the Bendix turret Brownings had been resolved yet?

Thanks

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:52 pm
Posts: 160
Shay wrote:
Jungle Bob


Also I was wondering if the paperwork issues with the Bendix turret Brownings had been resolved yet?

Thanks

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


The guns would have to be replaced with fakes anyway...or at least dummy right side receivers as the BATF is kinda strange about that kind of thing...and its the right side receivers that have the serial numbers associating them with the airplane to begin with.

_________________
One day I looked up and he's pushing 80...
He's got brown tobacco stains all down his chin.
To me he's one of the hero's of this country, so why is he all dressed up like them ole men....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:21 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
frankspeaks wrote:
The guns would have to be replaced with fakes anyway...or at least dummy right side receivers as the BATF is kinda strange about that kind of thing...and its the right side receivers that have the serial numbers associating them with the airplane to begin with.


"Say Again Your Last" That sucks. Regardless still it would be nice to have the original equipment with one of the few remaining Bendix turrets (I have no idea how many there are).

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:52 pm
Posts: 160
This one is the only bendix turret I know of or have even ever heard of actually existing.

Kinda strange about the .50's... used to be you could buy a parts set for 400 bucks. now days they are getting kinda scarce and the price has gone to about 4000 dollars for a good clean parts set minus right side receiver.

Dummy receivers can not be made to fire and cost about 100 bucks.

The right side receiver is the part that has to be registered with BATF as a machine gun.

_________________
One day I looked up and he's pushing 80...
He's got brown tobacco stains all down his chin.
To me he's one of the hero's of this country, so why is he all dressed up like them ole men....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:57 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3260
Location: Phoenix, Az
There are 2 bendix turrets that are known. The B-25 that was just pulled from the lake has one, and Swamp Ghost. kind of interesting that there were no known examples until this year, and there are now 2 that have been recovered


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:16 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4699
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Matt Gunsch wrote:
There are 2 bendix turrets that are known. The B-25 that was just pulled from the lake has one, and Swamp Ghost. kind of interesting that there were no known examples until this year, and there are now 2 that have been recovered


Forget the Monino Mitchell?...2 cases of my best Moscow vodka for
full walkaround/through shots and a good snap of the data-plate!

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Last edited by airnutz on Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 401
Location: Right here and now
Forgive a dumb question, but does SG has a Bendix turret in the top forward position as well as the belly turret. It was my understanding that the first 500 or so E's had that configuration.

Can anyone explain the switch to Sperry units?

regards,

t~


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 5:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 5:40 am
Posts: 463
Location: Shasta Lake, CA
The only dumb question is the one not asked. :)
SG would have the usual B-17 top turret. The Bendix belly turret was pretty much useless. The gunner laid on his stomach facing aft and sighted the 2 .50s thru a series of angled mirrors fitted to a periscope-like device housed in a clear bubble a few feet aft of the turret. This sucked mightily so they went to the Sperry from the 113rd production B-17E onwards.

Cheers,
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:17 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3274
Location: Las Vegas, NV
frankspeaks wrote:
The guns would have to be replaced with fakes anyway...or at least dummy right side receivers as the BATF is kinda strange about that kind of thing...and its the right side receivers that have the serial numbers associating them with the airplane to begin with.


Why don't the owners of the airplane work with local government and law enforcement to get permission to own several Title 2 firearms??

I've never understood this...it's not that difficult to own a machine gun (it is just expensive to purchase in the first place), there are just many hoops to jump through with local law enforcement where the guns will be "stationed". Unlike popular belief, there is not a special "license" required to own machine guns.

Of course, your mileage may vary if you're in a non-freedom loving state like Mass, New York, or Illinois, but I imagine that if the reason you're applying for the tax stamp for the guns is for the historical significance of an aircraft...well, that will open some different doors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:44 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
You are absolutely right, Randy. $200.00 non transferrable tax stamp for each Class 3 weapon. It aint that big a deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:52 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3274
Location: Las Vegas, NV
RickH wrote:
You are absolutely right, Randy. $200.00 non transferrable tax stamp for each Class 3 weapon. It aint that big a deal.


In the grand scheme, when you're talking about a somewhat historically significant aircraft, and the opportunity to maintain the original weapons with that aircraft, I think that the tax stamp fee (annually) is chump change compared to operating cost, maintenance cost, restoration cost, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 116 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group