Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 810
Location: Lincoln, California
I just added this post to the aerovintage website. For readers here, this is not new information. But on Facebook and other sites, and in some books too, you see these things repeated over and over. I thought it worth throwing eight (actually nine) of them together with explanations.

https://www.aerovintage.com/2024/03/24/eight-myths-about-the-b-17/

_________________
Scott Thompson
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
WIX Subscriber Since July 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4615
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Bonus Myth #10: A B-17 That Has A Chin Turret Can’t Be a B-17F

Mostly true, but there's at least one exception: 42-6030.
Image

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 810
Location: Lincoln, California
Chris Brame wrote:
Bonus Myth #10: A B-17 That Has A Chin Turret Can’t Be a B-17F

Mostly true, but there's at least one exception: 42-6030.


I think there were a number of late production B-17Fs that had chin turrets...it was a short-lived but a bit confusing transition from B-17F to B-17G.

Also, of particular interest to me is that a bunch of the surplus and unwanted B-25 Bendix lower turrets were supposedly shipped to England to be installed on B-17Fs as a stop gap measure. They retained the same aiming system as used in the B-25 and was just as unsuccessful in practice. Those modified B-17s (if any) evidently had the turrets quickly removed and the groups just waited for the new B-17Gs. (Source: AAF Study Development of Aircraft Gun Turrets in the AAF, 1917-1944).

I've been looking for a photo of one of those Bendix B-25 turrets on a B-17F but have come up empty so far. The B-25 turret had a different cover than that later used on the B-17G, and most likely retained the aiming periscope sight window on the turret.

Image

_________________
Scott Thompson
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
WIX Subscriber Since July 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 6:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4311
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I'll add one that crops up in many reference books and detail sets for model kits: "B-17 ball turrets had external ammunition bins." The ammo cans on B-17 ball turret were internal. The ones with the external ammo bins overhead were used on the B-24 and B-32. I think the confusion comes from several restored B-17s which have the external bins (that's not a knock on the restorers. I presume they went with that type of turret because it was all that was available.)

Steve


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 89
For the ball turret ammunition, as part of Maj. Robert J. Reed's B-17 modification test project program, an external ammunition supply for the ball turret was added, thereby affording the gunner with more room. In addition, this improved gunner comfort, as the gunner would now be able to wear a backpack parachute. Short, straight chutes were added to conduct ejected links out of the side of the turret thereby eliminating the cause of many stoppages. Unlike the standard ball turret this would make it possible to raise the gun covers ninety degrees to clear a blockage or make and adjustments.

"Reed’s “Dreamboat” ...
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=67817


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 8:20 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1660
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Avnut wrote:
Short, straight chutes were added to conduct ejected links out of the side of the turret thereby eliminating the cause of many stoppages.

I wonder if it is in any way related to the ejector chutes seen on some PB-1W nose turrets. It also reminds me of the venturi tube fume extractors on some B-25s in the sense of "getting things out of the airplane you don't want to be there".

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 344 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group