Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
Should it have been forbidden in the Gentlemen aviators so-called "rules of engagement" handbook?

Me 262's were alleged to be downed by the following fighters from what I've looked up:

Spitfire IX and XIV
P-47D
P-51D
La-7
Tempest

The 8th Air Force were alleged credited with 139 kills against German jets of all types and 110 air to air victories over the Me 262. The 56th FG got 7 equipped with the P-47 and the 78th FG and 353rd FG downed a couple more before transitioning to P-51's. The P-51 alleged to have close to 100 jet kills and the 8th AF Fighter Groups lost 12-15 fighters to Me 262's. Another source states: 125 Me 262's and Arado 234/Me 163's shot down.

It might be difficult to define exactly how many of these kills were 'during landing' - the Me 262 took a very long time to get up to full power after leaving the ground, and also had a very long approach, so technically many of the kills might be said to be during landing or take-off even when they occurred kilometers from the airstrip. In this case it was actually pretty easy once the Me 262 bases were found, all the American fighters just had to do was loiter around the airstrips and attack while they were landing and the jet throttles reduced (the German turbojets took several seconds to spool up).

Lt. Chuck Yeager of the 357th Fighter Group was one of the first American pilots to shoot down an Me 262, which he caught during its landing approach.

Most of my posted sources here:
https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/p ... ills.1226/

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
deleted


Last edited by quemerford on Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 316
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Early in the war British Nightfighters were downing German Bombers over their home airfields in the landing pattern off memory...

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 5:14 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5258
Location: Eastern Washington
Obviously, not quite the same thing as shooting a pilot descending in a parachute.
The parachuting pilot is helpless and might as well be surrendering.
If I remember the rules of war briefings we had while in the Air Force, shooting a crewmember parachuting from a disabled aircraft is against the Geneva Convention.
Not so, shooting paratroops.

The unfortunate jet pilots on the other hand were not surrendering, they were merely at a huge disadvantage due to aircraft operating limitations.
A bit like someone in a fighter trying to get the other guy in a position where he knows the enemy aircraft will stall or lose control.
Or to put it another way, a pilot takes advantage of his type's strengths and the enemy's weakness.
Usually, the more advanced aircraft has an advantage.

Certainly, 30 minutes prior to him being caught in his type's moment of weakness, the 262 pilot was exploiting his aircraft's strengths (speed) by attacking B-24s and exploiting their weaknesses.

So, it's no more "dirty" than shooting a guy who doesn't see you (in which cases many/most aces wouldn't be).
Or shooting down a "easy" kill...we have all seen gun camera shots of Ju-52s being shot down over the Med or Japanese flying boats in the Pacific.

And then there is the story of "Ye Olde Pub"... it's nice when an enemy gives " our" guys a pass, but it was probably rare on both sides.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:36 am
Posts: 316
Location: 5nm W of Biggin Hill
I believe there were instances of British fighters being destroyed while taking off/landing and also training aircraft also were attacked - Tiger Moths, Oxfords and so on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 316
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Yes during the BoB and period after hit and run raiders hit unsuspecting targets..Brits did same thing in 41 and 42.

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 270
Shooting stuff down in the circuit was common on all sides, as said above the RAF made a habit of intruding around enemy bases and shooting stuff down as often as possible, or even strafing aircraft and personnel on the ground if they could see well enough. It was also a staple tactic of the USAAF in Europe, finish the fighter escort task and then go strafing and attacking aircraft in the pattern, don't bring the bullets back. Catching 163's, 262's etc near bases was a particularly good idea as they were so potent and hard to catch in normal flight. Get them while you could, better than trying to catch up with it tomorrow at 500mph at 25,000ft.

There's a very sensible argument that the Luftwaffe missed a trick by not intruding over the UK more often, there were occasional intrusions but nothing like on the same scale as the RAF or USAAF. You have to wonder why they didn't press this more as a way of stopping RAF Bomber Command and even the 8th AF.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1522
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
Clayton Kelly Gross of the 354th GP, 9th AF, author of the book "Live Bait" 6 victories, one of them was a 262.

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
Interesting to read some of the responses.

I’m inclined to believe that gallantry amongst fighter pilots during WWII was an individual choice, and perhaps even a circumstantial decision, rather than a deliberate directive. Winning the day at all costs overrode the need for warriors compassion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 457
Location: Texas
Forbidden? No. The German pilot was going to rearm and refuel and go shoot down more American bombers with nine or ten Americans on board.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 1937
Location: Meriden,Ct.
That's why it's called war and not checkers. Besides being that close to an enemy base the risk of getting shot down by ground fire is increased..

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:53 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
I’ve always had a hard time buying the notion that chivalry existed much once methods of war advanced. Understandably so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 316
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Mark Allen M wrote:
I’ve always had a hard time buying the notion that chivalry existed much once methods of war advanced. Understandably so.

Maybe at the start but Total War and threat of invasion probably pushed that notion out of British pilots minds...Not to mention a lot of free European pilots who escaped..

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
phil65 wrote:
That's why it's called war and not checkers. Besides being that close to an enemy base the risk of getting shot down by ground fire is increased..

Phil


Gabby Gabreski, for instance, shot down in a P-47 while strafing a jet base.
Germans well knew their installations would attract wolves, and were prepared to deal with them.

[Thread title is ridiculous btw, not going to take the bait]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:53 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2537
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/23378


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christer, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 360 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group