Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 698
Many Gloster Gladiator pilots--an airplane I'm currently writing about--refused to use the airplane's four split landing flaps because they "upset the airplane's trim," which makes me think the pilot had no way of adjusting pitch trim. And I see no elevator trim tab on any Gladiator photos. Was there commonly a system, on airplanes of this generation, that could be cranked or manipulated to vary horizontal stabilizer angle of incidence?

When did easily adjustable (in flight) pitch trim come into common use?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
I think, "an airplane I'm currently writing about" might be a bit steep: looks like a lot of it has come from Google and the good folks here. I hope they'll receive due credit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 698
It's called research, and I am entirely open about what I am doing and why I am doing it, and I use my full name, not an alias. If you disagree with it, you are certainly welcome to decline to participate.

I use the Internet, I go to libraries, I read books and articles, I interview people, and I post queries hoping to get authoritative answers and information.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 1:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
If you think it's research then fine. But many queries would be better answered by reference to primary source data rather than anecdotal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 4:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 368
Interesting question. The Piper Cub certainly had an adjustable horizontal stabiliser so that's another example from the 1930s, but I cannot think of where it would have originated. Common sense says that trim would have emerged with the increasing speed ranges of various types, and I'm pretty sure that the DC-2 for example had it. The Fokker triplanes did not have elevator trim, at least not the early ones which turned up in the 1920s. So based on that (which is not much more than my memory, a bit of gut feeling and three minutes of looking at images on the internet) it doesn't surprise me that a 1930s type did not have a trim tab or adjustable horizontal stabiliser. I guess it emerged on larger and smaller types throughout the 1920s and 1930s to become pretty much standard by the late 1930s.

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 5:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 698
Thank you, Archer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:30 am
Posts: 37
quemerford wrote:
If you think it's research then fine. But many queries would be better answered by reference to primary source data rather than anecdotal.


That's easily said. I do primary research for fun and profit - but it's been mighty impossible for the last two years with all the archives and museum research sections closed to the public. In their absence, places like this become the resource - many of us have primary documents in our collection...

Cheers,


Dana


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:12 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 1057
Location: Virginia
Sopwith airplanes had adjustable stabilizers as early as 1916. Surely the Gladiator did also.



-

_________________
http://www.biplanerides1.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 8:34 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 1057
Location: Virginia
Trim wheel on the left of the seat
Image


-

_________________
http://www.biplanerides1.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 10:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:36 am
Posts: 316
Location: 5nm W of Biggin Hill
Pretty sure Pilot published a flight test of the Gladiator (by Andy Sephton?) about 20 years ago when James Gilbert was still at the helm, I recall Shuttleworth's example gracing the cover - I might still have my copy in the loft somewhere...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 1:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 1057
Location: Virginia
Question already answered in his other thread:

unit/Tailplane

The tail unit assembly consists of a port and starboard tailplane, port and starboard elevators, fin and rudder. The tailplane is adjustable for incidence (providing pitch trim control) and is mounted at the rear of the fuselage. The tailplane front spar is braced by two external bracing wires on each side, the wires running from the outboard ends of the spar diagonally up to fittings attached to the fin leading edge structure and spar post. The underside of the tailplane front spar is also braced by a single wire on each side, the wire running diagonally down to a fitting connected to the fuselage lower longeron. The tail plane front spars are connected to the bearing beam of the fuselage, and the rear spars to the after end of the tail adjusting gear locating arm by means of which the incidence is varied.


-

_________________
http://www.biplanerides1.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 698
Baldeagle, thank you. That photo is pretty authoritative.

I am going to stop querying members of this forum, however. Seems some people don't like it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2022 3:05 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1394
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
Baldeagle, thank you. That photo is pretty authoritative.

I am going to stop querying members of this forum, however. Seems some people don't like it.


Yay. :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 12:02 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5258
Location: Eastern Washington
Though I'm not claiming these were early examples, I was surprised to see a WACO UPF-7 with an adjustable stabilizer and even more surprising was the Hamilton H-47 Metalplane.
That might be the first use on a metal airliner.

I enjoy seeing your questions, please feel free to continue.
Last time I checjed, it's still a free country, so ask away.
Those who don't like them don't have to read your threads or participate.

Simple.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 2:15 am
Posts: 738
Location: Misawa, Japan
Stephan,

Seems like only one person had issues, screw him. Others learned something from your query. So I say keep querying away.

Mac

_________________
WWII Naval Aviation Research - Pacific
https://www.ww2nar-pac.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 378 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group