Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 5:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 343
Location: Between RAAF Uranquinty and RAAF Temora
Of pretty-much all WW2 twins, the Catalina is possibly the best-designed type to be forced down onto Loch Ness. It ended better than Wellington N2980 did! Although the Wimpey wouldn't have been around to be admired today, had it not taken on water there!

_________________
Matt Austin - playing with warbirds since the early 80s.

See my Lee-Enfield videos at - http://www.youtube.com/user/Jollygreenslugg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Quote:
I would suggest until the operating crew specifically states that their intention was to attempt a take off on one engine, it didn't happen.


The big question is who will be the investigating authority, the AAIB (Air Accident Investigation Board) or the MAIB (Marine Accident Investigation Board)? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
Jollygreenslugg wrote:
Of pretty-much all WW2 twins, the Catalina is possibly the best-designed type to be forced down onto Loch Ness.


It wasn't forced down onto Loch Ness, it was already there, the starter issued happened when it was attempting to start up to take off from Loch Ness.....which has been made clear in all the posts so far........


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
86583 wrote:
well looking at the pictures one prop is feathered.. there is no reason to feather a prop for trouble shooting or replacing a starter so I would think there is an ulterior motive..

having a little experience herding a PBY on one engine I couldn't imagine attempting it, unless it's a matter of life or death..

replacing a starter while standing on a sea stand isn't a lot of fun but it's not the end of the world.. especially when a wrench or nut goes "plunk" into the water to be gone forever.. now an engine or prop change using sea stands is another story..

I assume the aircraft is fully insured.. I somehow suspect if the underwriter was presented with a claim for any damage or loss of the airframe being caused by a single engine water takeoff "attempt" they would be very quick to send you a "claim denied" notification...


I can perhaps see why they gave it a go, if the water surface on the Loch had been flat calm, and with such a long length of Loch to play with. Inverness airport is only about 15 miles away, and from the end of Loch Ness, its only about 5 miles over land along the valley until getting back over water of the Moray Firth giving a bit of leeway to skirt around Inverness over water for the approach to Inverness which is right along side the Moray Firth.
While not in the book, and having a degree of risk, in the circumstances of the location and proximity to Inverness airport, I can sort of see why they'd give it a go just to see - especially with a 20 miles long water runway at their disposal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:15 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1380
Thankfully a few reasoned replies here amid the armchair shock jocks. I'm familiar with the loch and the area and I can easily see why you would give it a go. You get enough height before the end of the loch and you glide to the firth if the other engine goes. If not you settle back down and taxy back.

But I rather suspect they were trying to get enough speed to start the other engine. That is what you might try concurrent with an attempted departure, or even prior to a re-taxy and subsequent departure.

The engine didn't start on those two attempts so they erred to caution.

Sensible. No need for shock.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
86583 wrote:
now an engine or prop change using sea stands is another story..


And from a recent tweet from them, that now sadly looks like what they indeed will be having to do :-x as after investigation the problem is more than just the starter, and they need to change the engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
quemerford wrote:
But I rather suspect they were trying to get enough speed to start the other engine. That is what you might try concurrent with an attempted departure, or even prior to a re-taxy and subsequent departure.

The engine didn't start on those two attempts so they erred to caution.


Photo's show prop feathered, so I doubt they were trying to do that, well not on the second attempt at a take-off at any rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1380
I've only seen photos of the prop feathered after the attempted take-offs so I can't comment on whether it was feathered during the take-off attempts or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:26 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7541
Strangest thing! One of those photos seems to show something unusual sticking out of the water.

Hmmm!!

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:26 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2373
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Strangest thing! One of those photos seems to show something unusual sticking out of the water.

Hmmm!!


Mark.......surely! U must have a more detailed pic of this in your archives!!!! LOL.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:45 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2295
I'm surprised there isn't a place where you could lower the gear in the water & drag it up a beach given the size of the loch.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 4:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
ZRX61 wrote:
I'm surprised there isn't a place where you could lower the gear in the water & drag it up a beach given the size of the loch.


When you look around the place on Google Earth, there really isn't many places to do that, most of the Loch has no beach edges, and the few beaches it does have are either no accessible for something big enough to drag it up, or the pebble beaches are quite steeply shelved.

I've heard that yesterday its been towed across the bay to the jetty pier at Temple Pier, which again looking on Google earth does seem the only place it could be lifted out of the water and onto the pier, which is about 30-32ft wide. Only issue is they will need a very large mobile crane with a lift capacity of around 12Te at a reach of around 35-40m and access down to that jetty for a mobile crane of that size is going to be a challenge.......and expensive......and as long as the jetty can take the weight of crane plus Cat.....??

But that looks like what they are aiming to try and do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
Sometimes it could be very difficult to find a place to put a simple boat on a trailer and back, in location where there is lot of boat.

I cross my fingers everything will go fine.

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:00 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2693
Location: NP, NJ, USA
I just saw on Facebook that Miss Pick-up was successfully lifted onto dry land. Good news. Looks like they had the right team to do the job.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 655
Location: Berkshire, UK
TAdan wrote:
I just saw on Facebook that Miss Pick-up was successfully lifted onto dry land. Good news. Looks like they had the right team to do the job.


Yes indeed, FB post says it was Stoddart's crane hire, and given Stoddart's past 'help' with such things of this nature I wouldn't be surprised if they have done a 'very special rate' to help them out of this pickle.....


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group