Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:03 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 9:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
wolf wrote:
and some of us worked on B-17 / PB-1W's when they were still working air tankers, but being a big shot, big mouth must make you special. Guess you would be perfect candidate to be a B-17 FE with the Collings Foundation


Regardless of what happened with Collings, dropping into a forum and throwing sharp elbows at other operators while posting under an alias isn't how you win friends and influence people.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 9:20 pm
Posts: 810
Location: Lincoln, California
To be fair, he did not say he read "some books," he said he has been reading every B-17 accident report from 1944-1945 looking for information.

wolf wrote:
I had to read the FAA report several times, and it would surprise me to find that a majority warbird flying today for these type of flights do not have the properly trained crews on board....

...If you want to question my quals - in addition to my aviation experience, I have for the past 6++ years been reading every B-17 accident report from 1944 - 1945 looking for information for my books. Over 1,000 reports and I have read some crazy stuff, but this FAA report is damning.


He also seemed to be saying that he would be surprised to find that a similar situation for other operators...not the opposite. Perhaps that is not what he meant but that's what he wrote.

_________________
Scott Thompson
Aero Vintage Books
http://www.aerovintage.com
WIX Subscriber Since July 2017


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:11 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11280
One would hope that all operators take these regulations and requirements seriously. An operator should have nothing to fear from an audit.

As with most accidents, it isn't just one thing that causes it, it is a combination of multiple factors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:30 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4479
Location: Dallas, TX
Kyleb wrote:
Regardless of what happened with Collings, dropping into a forum and throwing sharp elbows at other operators while posting under an alias isn't how you win friends and influence people.

Neither is jumping on newbies, y'all!

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:42 am
Posts: 23
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 908
Location: ELP
blue3992 wrote:
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


That is a good question. They bought a large part of Jaques Littlefield's tank collection and another B-17. Did that affect their maintenance funds?

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 11:43 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1160
Just wow, really tough to read some of the concerns highlighted in the FAA document.

I get we don't wont to compare operators too much, but some of these elements remind me of the 2009 Thunder City EE Lightning crash in South Africa where the investigation found serious deficiencies in the program, which most had previously thought to be a well funded, thoroughly run, safety conscious enterprise. Sobering.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:01 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2295
wolf wrote:
I had to read the FAA report several times, and it would surprise me to find that a majority warbird flying today for these type of flights do not have the properly trained crews on board.


Wolf said 'It WOULD surprise me".. people are reacting as if he said "wouldn't"...

Or is this like when Americans say "I could care less" when they actually mean they couldn't? Clarification needed.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:05 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2295
blue3992 wrote:
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


They have a volunteer group on FB with over 1000 members. It's not viewable to non-members.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:13 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7557
ZRX61 wrote:
wolf wrote:
I had to read the FAA report several times, and it would surprise me to find that a majority warbird flying today for these type of flights do not have the properly trained crews on board.


Wolf said 'It WOULD surprise me".. people are reacting as if he said "wouldn't"...

Or is this like when Americans say "I could care less" when they actually mean they couldn't? Clarification needed.

^ Agreed! although I usually replace "I couldn't care less" with "I couldn't give a f**K!" :wink:, but that's just me.

The guy seemed to be spot on with his post. No need to jump all over him if those of you doing the jumping didn't understand his post. Seems he has plenty of experience and knowledge. Read it again perhaps. Just a thought or just don't give a f**K! lol

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3260
Location: Phoenix, Az
wolf wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
whistlingdeath77 wrote:

WOW, you read some books about the b-17 huh. You must be an expert then.


I guess we have to defer to the expert, unlike those of us who only have been working on 17's for the last 30-40 YEARS


and some of us worked on B-17 / PB-1W's when they were still working air tankers, but being a big shot, big mouth must make you special. Guess you would be perfect candidate to be a B-17 FE with the Collings Foundation


wow someone with 30 posts, who does not know who is who on the board, let alone their qualifications, I probably have more time wrenching on 17's 24's 25's and just about any other warbird that is flying today.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:18 pm
Posts: 154
Matt Gunsch wrote:

wow someone with 30 posts, who does not know who is who on the board, let alone their qualifications, I probably have more time wrenching on 17's 24's 25's and just about any other warbird that is flying today.


I have been in and out of this forum for the past 20-years, as well as the ex-AAF Forum, Aerovintage forum and bunch of other forums on and off since the mid to late 1990's. I walk-in see if the people are still as nasty as before then when I feel my efforts and experience are sh*t on, I walk away.

As far as wrenching on 17's, 24's & 25's, do I have to remind you that the pilot of 44-83575 had over 6,000 hr in type, he still screwed up his emergency, still screwed-up his landing and still screwed-up the maintenance on this B-17 (and got himself and his passenger dead) -- Just because you have 40 years "" being a wrench head "" does not mean you know what you are doing is correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:40 pm
Posts: 269
Location: On the road
Clifford Bossie wrote:
blue3992 wrote:
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


That is a good question. They bought a large part of Jaques Littlefield's tank collection and another B-17. Did that affect their maintenance funds?



Point of clarification - It is my understanding that the Littlefield Collection was donated to the CF by the widow/family of JL. I imagine they invested funds for transportation and refurbishment, but I don't believe they 'bought' it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 908
Location: ELP
Vagabond wrote:
Clifford Bossie wrote:
blue3992 wrote:
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


That is a good question. They bought a large part of Jaques Littlefield's tank collection and another B-17. Did that affect their maintenance funds?



Point of clarification - It is my understanding that the Littlefield Collection was donated to the CF by the widow/family of JL. I imagine they invested funds for transportation and refurbishment, but I don't believe they 'bought' it.


I stand corrected. The collection was willed to The Collings Foundation and after his passing some of it was sold off at auction.

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:39 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2295
Vagabond wrote:
Clifford Bossie wrote:
blue3992 wrote:
Always got the impression that the Collings Foundation was well-funded, but the FAA report seems to paint a different picture.

Curious as to how their maintenance was structured? Volunteers? Paid staff? A mix of both?


That is a good question. They bought a large part of Jaques Littlefield's tank collection and another B-17. Did that affect their maintenance funds?



Point of clarification - It is my understanding that the Littlefield Collection was donated to the CF by the widow/family of JL. I imagine they invested funds for transportation and refurbishment, but I don't believe they 'bought' it.



There was a fund raiser at the time to come up $10M to transport the collection across the country & build a shed for it. There was also mention that CF would keep all the unique stuff.. some of which ended up being sold off at the auction.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brian-livingston, Google [Bot] and 123 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group