Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:14 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 550 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 ... 37  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 657
Location: Berkshire, UK
Xray wrote:
And at this point, unfortunately it doesn't look very good for Collings and obviously can have a trickle down effect on other operators.


Sadly, yes it doesn't look good for CF, and yes, the trickle down effect could also be equally bad for others, just as we've pretty much seen the almost total ending of jet warbird operations here in the UK as a result of the Shoreham Hunter crash.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 3:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1161
CoastieJohn wrote:
More of a general feeling question......


Totally depends on the situation, and also important to remember that the insurance company or the estate might do something even if you do not "want" to do a lawsuit.

I am usually in the no lawsuit category when doing something that has a bit of risk. I ride motorcycles, hike, kayak etc. and assume that there is some risk and would never normally sue a landowner or operator when it comes to "accidents". Boats sink, planes crash, people slip, etc.

Now alleged gross misconduct, falsified or not completed maintenance is a whole other level. A good analogy may be some of the "Duck" boat accidents that I am sure your have heard about at CG HQ and are likely going away for good (with DUKW's at least). Would I take a duck boat ride? Maybe. Would I take a duck boat ride in a thunderstorm, no way. Would I take a duck boat ride if I knew they had falsified records and not conducted maintenance- absolutely no way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
Firebird wrote:
Xray wrote:
And at this point, unfortunately it doesn't look very good for Collings and obviously can have a trickle down effect on other operators.


Sadly, yes it doesn't look good for CF, and yes, the trickle down effect could also be equally bad for others, just as we've pretty much seen the almost total ending of jet warbird operations here in the UK as a result of the Shoreham Hunter crash.


Crash in UK was indeed horrific, tough to even watch.

Not many people/groups with the capability and finances to operate jet warbirds [as you know] ... Outside of a few F-86's and Mig 15's, we have [had] a flying F-100 for a few years due solely to the efforts of 1 man, not sure what its status is now, hasn't made many shows last couple of years. Same with the F-4 Phantom, was reputed to be undergoing an avionics upgrade, don't think it has flown in at least 3 years.
Had a pair of F-104's flying the airshow circuit and I saw them once, don't think they are operational anymore. And there is a civilian A-4, can't think of any others they are truly a rarity. Has been talk for years of a civilian operated F-14, not holding my breath for that.
But my point is, even if they placed restrictions or an outright ban on civy operated jet warbirds, the effect would be almost unnoticeable. I think the effect will be felt mostly on groups that rely on finances from giving rides, Yankee AF for one in Ypsi MI with a flying B-17 and B-25.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
Xray wrote:
we have [had] a flying F-100 for a few years due solely to the efforts of 1 man

I know Dean. He wouldn't agree with you.

http://www.businesspeople.com/Post/2724 ... could-talk

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
Mark Allen M wrote:
Xray wrote:
we have [had] a flying F-100 for a few years due solely to the efforts of 1 man

I know Dean. He wouldn't agree with you.

http://www.businesspeople.com/Post/2724 ... could-talk


I know he is not literally a 1 man show, aircraft would have never flown without 1 man and that is Dean.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 6:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
Xray wrote:
I know he is not literally a 1 man show, aircraft would have never flown without 1 man and that is Dean.

Still wrong, but believe what you want to believe.

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
Mark Allen M wrote:
Xray wrote:
I know he is not literally a 1 man show, aircraft would have never flown without 1 man and that is Dean.

Still wrong, but believe what you want to believe.


I see I've had you on ignore for years, starting to see why, you are whining and argumentative.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 9:07 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
[EDITED]

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 10:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 156
Location: Pearland, TX
Xray wrote:
Firebird wrote:
Xray wrote:
And at this point, unfortunately it doesn't look very good for Collings and obviously can have a trickle down effect on other operators.


Sadly, yes it doesn't look good for CF, and yes, the trickle down effect could also be equally bad for others, just as we've pretty much seen the almost total ending of jet warbird operations here in the UK as a result of the Shoreham Hunter crash.


Crash in UK was indeed horrific, tough to even watch.

Not many people/groups with the capability and finances to operate jet warbirds [as you know] ... Outside of a few F-86's and Mig 15's, we have [had] a flying F-100 for a few years due solely to the efforts of 1 man, not sure what its status is now, hasn't made many shows last couple of years. Same with the F-4 Phantom, was reputed to be undergoing an avionics upgrade, don't think it has flown in at least 3 years.
Had a pair of F-104's flying the airshow circuit and I saw them once, don't think they are operational anymore. And there is a civilian A-4, can't think of any others they are truly a rarity. Has been talk for years of a civilian operated F-14, not holding my breath for that.
But my point is, even if they placed restrictions or an outright ban on civy operated jet warbirds, the effect would be almost unnoticeable. I think the effect will be felt mostly on groups that rely on finances from giving rides, Yankee AF for one in Ypsi MI with a flying B-17 and B-25.


There are literally more jet warbirds flying in the US now, than at any other time. Most are L-39’s, but the fact still remains. As to the rest...there are 2 flying F-100’s, the F-4 last flew in December 2019 and could fly tomorrow if needed, the 2 airworthy F-104’s have now expanded to nearly 6 on a contract for NASA, there are about 20 civilian A-4s with more in the pipeline, and the F-14 is likely to never happen because there are no candidates to be had.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2020 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
Well yeah, would be a stretch to think of an l39 as a warbird, but jet it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 657
Location: Berkshire, UK
Xray wrote:
Well yeah, would be a stretch to think of an l39 as a warbird, but jet it is.


In that case neither are the Jet Provost, T.11 Vampire, T.1 Gnat, T-33 or T-38?

And the T-6 Texan/SNJ/Harvard isn't a piston engined 'warbird' either I presume?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 7:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:25 am
Posts: 485
Not sure exactly what your point is firebird or if you have one, don't really feel like an off topic debate on what constitutes a jet warbird.
l39 has seen a bit of action in the 3rd world, don't really care to dig in any more in its rich and illustrious history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2020 8:41 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2660
Location: 16 mi. N of DFW Airport
Dean's narrow-minded definition of "warbird": an ex-military aircraft which is now in civilian hands.

_________________
Dean Hemphill, K5DH
Lake Dallas, Republic of Texas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 4:57 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2295
Ryan Harris wrote:

There are literally more jet warbirds flying in the US now, than at any other time. Most are L-39’s, but the fact still remains. As to the rest...there are 2 flying F-100’s, the F-4 last flew in December 2019 and could fly tomorrow if needed, the 2 airworthy F-104’s have now expanded to nearly 6 on a contract for NASA, there are about 20 civilian A-4s with more in the pipeline, and the F-14 is likely to never happen because there are no candidates to be had.


Art Nalls Harrier....

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2020 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:05 pm
Posts: 195
Location: Durham, NC, U.S.
[/url]http://courtesyaircraft.com/aircraft/3-harrier-aircraft-package/[/url]

Not to thread jump too much, but the Harrier(s) are currently for sale on Courtesy.

_________________
I'm looking for that buried Corsair(s) that I can dig up, pressure wash, and fly!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 550 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 ... 37  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AG pilot, Google [Bot], Mark Sampson, phil65 and 113 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group